The current approach to intelligent agent development may be going astray. Many teams try to use a universal robot to handle everything—perceiving the market, making decisions, managing risks—but the result is often bulky and not precise enough.
The real opportunity lies in modularization. Instead of piling on features, it's better to use specialized intelligent agents to divide tasks and collaborate. Imagine this architecture: one agent dedicated to market sentiment analysis, another focused on trading execution logic, and an independent one responsible for risk control. The collaboration of these three lightweight, focused units can actually unleash greater efficiency.
This modular stacking approach offers a new perspective for Web3 developers. It's not about larger monoliths, but more flexible combinations.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CascadingDipBuyer
· 12-17 21:57
The modular division of labor should have been played like this a long time ago; monolithic robots are indeed a pit.
---
So the key still depends on who can coordinate these lightweight components well.
---
Another seemingly new but actually very basic idea, why does it take another several teams half a year to figure it out.
---
Agreed, a well-executed combination punch can crush the mediocre all-in-one solutions.
---
The real question is how many can actually implement this architecture; most are just talking.
---
This idea is somewhat similar to microservices; the Web3 ecosystem should have done this a long time ago.
---
Lightweight + professional + coordination, we've found a way, and should continue to deepen in this direction.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMaker
· 12-17 21:55
It sounds like the microservices architecture, just moved to the agent and sold again?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermit
· 12-17 21:55
Modularization is indeed interesting; I'm already tired of the monolithic approach.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 12-17 21:54
Modularity is truly the way to go; a large all-in-one AI agent is really disappointing.
View OriginalReply0
ILCollector
· 12-17 21:51
I agree with this approach. I've seen too many all-in-one AI agent projects before, and they all get stuck at the execution layer.
You're right, modular division of labor is indeed the right path.
The monolith is too heavy. Really, microservices should have been adopted long ago.
But the problem is... who will coordinate these three modules?
That seems to be the real challenge.
The current approach to intelligent agent development may be going astray. Many teams try to use a universal robot to handle everything—perceiving the market, making decisions, managing risks—but the result is often bulky and not precise enough.
The real opportunity lies in modularization. Instead of piling on features, it's better to use specialized intelligent agents to divide tasks and collaborate. Imagine this architecture: one agent dedicated to market sentiment analysis, another focused on trading execution logic, and an independent one responsible for risk control. The collaboration of these three lightweight, focused units can actually unleash greater efficiency.
This modular stacking approach offers a new perspective for Web3 developers. It's not about larger monoliths, but more flexible combinations.