Aster's live trading tournament just revealed something pretty striking—human traders are bleeding red with a 28 percent drawdown, while their AI counterparts are chilling right around breakeven. It's a telling snapshot of how algorithmic trading stacks up against manual decision-making under tournament pressure. The gap between human and machine performance here raises interesting questions about execution speed, emotional discipline, and whether data-driven models really do outshine gut-call trading when it comes to protecting capital.