Acclaimed director Bruce Straley, known for The Last of Us, has taken a firm stance against generative AI tools in his creative work. Even if the technology produces "compelling" results, he refuses to adopt it.



Straley's critique goes deeper than surface-level skepticism. He describes generative AI as "a snake eating its own tail," highlighting a fundamental limitation: the technology lacks genuine growth and independent thinking. Instead of creating, it merely consumes existing data and patterns.

This perspective reflects broader concerns within the creative industry about AI's sustainability in artistic fields. Rather than complementing human creativity, generative tools risk becoming extractive systems that cannibalize human-generated content without contributing original thinking to the ecosystem.

For creators building in Web3 and digital spaces, Straley's position underscores an important principle—authenticity and genuine creation still matter.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MeaninglessApevip
· 2025-12-20 19:56
The artist is right; no matter how fancy AI gets, it can't change the essence of plagiarism. Web3 creators, don't be fooled.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 2025-12-19 19:46
The snake eating its own tail is a perfect metaphor; AI is essentially consuming its own capital... There's no real creativity, only a parrot, no wrong words.
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpandervip
· 2025-12-19 16:24
The snake eating its own tail is a perfect metaphor; AI is just gnawing on the bones of its predecessors and can't produce anything truly new.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 2025-12-19 08:51
NGL Straley is right, AI is like a vampire-style creative plunder, and it's bound to crash sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
DaoGovernanceOfficervip
· 2025-12-18 01:54
look, straley's right but empirically speaking the ai industry doesn't actually care about this distinction. the data suggests we're already past the point where extraction becomes the default incentive structure. it's just decentralization theater for creative fields at this point.
Reply0
FlashLoanPrincevip
· 2025-12-18 01:53
NGL Bruce said it perfectly, AI is just a big parrot, no matter how much it is optimized, it can't produce something truly original.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHomelessvip
· 2025-12-18 01:46
Nah, this guy is so right. AI drawing relies on consuming existing assets to survive and can't produce new things... Truly tasteful creative people all have this attitude.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgainvip
· 2025-12-18 01:25
Once again, AI has liquidated it. Well said, Straley. This thing is like a snake eating its own tail; in the end, the collateralization ratio skyrockets and there's nothing left.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)