2025-12-18 03:25:10

Some projects are recalibrating their incentive structures. Rather than chasing fleeting campaign metrics, the focus is shifting toward building sustainable long-term engagement. Shutting down short-term reward programs and reallocating resources—that's a statement in itself.

But here's the thing: information without substance won't cut it in this space. Anyone can talk about innovation, utility, or growth. What separates projects that matter from noise? Actual outcomes. Delivering real value, not just narrative. When the hype cycle cools, only ecosystems with tangible fundamentals and genuine community traction survive the reality check.

The market rewards patience paired with execution.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SilentObserver

· 2025-12-18 03:54

Closing short-term rewards just to tell stories? These days, few can really survive --- Nice words, but in the end, it all depends on who is actually working --- Sustainable and long-term participation... tired of hearing it, just want to see who can survive the next bear market --- Honestly, most projects that change their incentive structures are just short on funds --- Projects with solid fundamentals have already been exposed, no suspense left --- Those projects that boast about execution capability, they should have been eliminated long ago --- Sustainable? Let’s wait and see, as long as it doesn’t cut into my head

View OriginalReply0

FadCatcher

· 2025-12-18 03:52

Finally, someone dares to speak the truth. Too many projects only tell stories, and when the bear market hits, everything is exposed. The key is whether real money is involved; everything else is nonsense. Short-term rewards should be cut if necessary. Only those who can survive are the real deal. Only after this round can we see who is genuinely working hard and who is just scamming the investors.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinTherapist

· 2025-12-18 03:42

Well said, I'm really tired of those projects that boast every day without any products. --- Short-term incentives being shut down is useless; the key is to have something tangible. --- It's the same old story; in reality, most projects don't even have fundamentals. --- Wait, how do those projects still survive that are still playing the short-term reward game? Truly puzzled. --- It sounds good, but execution is another matter. I've seen too many cases. --- Patience and execution are easy to talk about but hard to do, brother. --- That's right, the era of pumping and dumping then running away is over. --- Those who still hype concepts without data can be directly blocked. --- The problem is investors simply can't wait, so in the end, this approach still fails. --- Finally, someone is saying this. Too many fake projects are just muddying the waters.

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy

· 2025-12-18 03:42

That's right, but the key is how many projects are really willing to do this. Most are still just loud slogans. --- Long-term participation sounds good, but the problem is users are already used to being exploited. Why should they trust you? --- Honestly, those still touting innovation and practicality are mostly just making empty promises. --- Reliable projects have already started working; there's no need to shout about it every day. --- These words should be revisited during the bear market to see who truly survives. --- Huh? These days, are there really projects that care about fundamentals? I haven't seen any. --- Resource reallocation sounds professional, but ultimately it's just about stopping the bleeding due to lack of funds. --- Only those who can stay calm will win, but the vast majority can't wait. --- The real screening mechanism is time—separating the wheat from the chaff and the doers from the water projects.

View OriginalReply0