2025-12-18 03:35:25

Instead of focusing on flashy mascots and marketing gimmicks, it's better to focus on truly capable players. The project's core competitiveness is the guarantee of long-term value; don't be fooled by superficial packaging. What is needed is genuine substance, not superficial appearances.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Ser_Liquidated

· 2025-12-20 22:15

Wake up, who still cares about these colorful things? Isn't it better to look directly at on-chain data? Really, those who are still brainwashed by marketing are probably newcomers. Core competitiveness is the key, everything else is superficial. A strong team and solid technology are what matter; all the packaging is unnecessary. Don't be fooled by those cute mascots; you still need to focus on the real stuff. Exactly, too many people only look at promotional materials.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 2025-12-18 04:05

Laughing to death, you're right, but how many projects in the crypto world really have hardcore strength? Most are just packaging masters. --- Core competitiveness? Bro, I think most whitepapers are just copywriting competitions. --- Wake up, projects with real substance have already risen. What you're seeing now are just marketing leftovers. --- Mascots harvesting profits, technology is the real king, but unfortunately most people can't understand code and can only look at NFT avatars. --- I give this analysis a full score, but unfortunately everyone still prefers to rush in and get numb. --- There are a bunch of superficial projects, truly hardcore ones are rare as phoenix feathers, with a 95% chance of choosing wrong. --- Honestly, those who can see through this should go into investing, no need to comment here.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 2025-12-18 03:49

Well said, I love to hear that. Many projects have failed due to chaotic governance mechanisms, and no matter how fancy the marketing is, it can't save them.

View OriginalReply0

tx_or_didn't_happen

· 2025-12-18 03:48

There's nothing wrong with that, but honestly, how many people are really looking at the fundamentals now? Everyone is busy chasing concepts and trading short-term.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlady

· 2025-12-18 03:39

Well said. Many projects are just packaging an empty shell, constantly engaging in meaningless marketing, and their fundamentals are a mess. Honestly, there are very few people who can calmly focus on technology and ecosystem; most are just looking for quick double-ups. I agree. Long-term gains depend on the project's own solid strength. Those that rely on mascots to gain popularity will eventually cool off. Really? I’ve seen too many such projects in the past two years, paying influencers to hype them up, but they lack any technical accumulation. I totally agree. Just by looking at whitepapers and team lineups, you can weed out half of the scams.

View OriginalReply0