2025-12-18 05:25:12

The AI arms race essentially comes down to one brutal equation: whoever scales compute, power, and capital fastest in the next 2-3 years survives. That's the core message being discussed across the industry right now.

Looking at the competitive landscape, one major player appears positioned to move aggressively. With an estimated $30 billion in annual resources allocated to development, the timeline for potential AGI breakthroughs is getting remarkably compressed—early 2026 projections are floating around certain circles.

There's also emerging discussion about the latest generation models. Performance benchmarks suggest around a 10% probability of achieving certain capability thresholds, though these metrics remain subject to rapid iteration.

What's clear: this isn't about incremental improvements anymore. It's about who can stack the most silicon, secure the most power infrastructure, and deploy capital at scale before the competition does. The next 24-36 months will likely determine which players hold dominant positions in this technological shift.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugDocScientist

· 2025-12-20 22:23

30 billion invested, huh? This guy really isn't afraid of burning money, right? AGI in 2026? I think it's more like they'll burn through all the money before 2026, haha.

View OriginalReply0

EternalMiner

· 2025-12-20 19:21

Investing 30 billion USD, and expecting AGI by 2026? Is this guy serious? It feels like a gamble with his life.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 2025-12-18 05:55

Chip stacks, power grabs, is that all? Feels like the final winners are still those rich folks. --- 2026? So soon? Seems like there's a lot of hype involved. --- Spending 30 billion dollars, in essence, it's a game of capital; technology is secondary. --- A ten percent chance to hype AGI, the industry is a bit crazy. --- If there's really a winner and loser, energy is the key; without power, everything else is useless. --- Stacking chips like this feels like a money-burning game; whoever has more capital wins. --- 24 to 36 months, it's definitely a gamble. --- This approach has long ceased to be a technical competition; it's purely about burning money faster, which is a bit boring.

View OriginalReply0

CoconutWaterBoy

· 2025-12-18 05:49

This is really a arms race now, burning money to the end. Those without electrical infrastructure will have to step aside.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaximalist

· 2025-12-18 05:32

ngl this is just arms race theater at this point. everyone's obsessing over 2026 but nobody's talking about the actual bottleneck—energy infrastructure. you can't just stack chips without solving the power grid crisis first. that's the real constraint nobody's pricing in correctly tbh

Reply0

RooftopReserver

· 2025-12-18 05:31

Can't keep pushing anymore, really. Pouring 30 billion just for the AGI dream in 2026, are these people crazy? Computing power is king, but who will pay the electricity bills? In 2-3 years, it will determine life or death. It seems no one will live to see the industry of 2028.

View OriginalReply0