When AI meets artistic creation, the definition of generative art is being rewritten. No longer just algorithmic outputs, AI-native art has evolved into an independent form of creative expression—it breathes, it thinks, and it has its own soul. The emergence of AINFTs has provided a home for these dynamic, flowing creative works. Technology is just the surface; the true breakthrough is that generative art is breaking free from the shackles of "tools" and becoming a genuine creative life existing in the Web3 world. Future art collections may just be like this—possessing both aesthetic depth and innovative vitality.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfCustodyBro
· 15h ago
Uh... Does AI have a soul? That statement is a bit too romantic. Honestly, it's just the result of parameter tuning.
---
Can AINFT really revolutionize the art world? I remain skeptical.
---
That's a bit far-fetched. If generated art has a "soul," does that mean my wallet has a soul when it's empty?
---
Algorithm-generated works that have a hint of aesthetics can dare to call themselves art—too magical.
---
But to be fair, Web3 art is indeed much more transparent than traditional auction houses.
---
They're just gilding generated art again; true creativity still depends on humans.
---
AINFT is interesting, but don't over-mythologize it. It's still just a tool, a tool.
---
Deep aesthetic value + innovative vitality—this phrase is used... a bit perfunctorily.
---
The word "soul" has been overused. Machines are just machines; don't attribute human qualities to them.
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwich
· 15h ago
Hmm, starting to praise AI art as having a soul again. Sounds good, but isn't it just about throwing money into AINFTs in the end?
---
Using the word "soul" is a bit harsh. If it truly has a soul, why does it still need NFTs to prove identity?
---
Let's put it this way: art that can make money is good art, whether it's algorithm-based or brush-based.
---
Wait, can your creative life first solve the copyright issues before bragging?
---
Sounds good, but what about practical implementation? The trading volume data of AINFTs speaks for itself.
---
I'm a bit brainwashed haha. Can aesthetic depth linked to Web3 really increase in value?
---
I just want to know if these generative artworks will still be valuable ten years from now.
---
Well said, but do the holders really treat it as art or just as an investment product?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassin
· 15h ago
Hmm... sounds good, but does it really have a soul? Or are we just putting a poetic shell over the algorithm again?
When AI meets artistic creation, the definition of generative art is being rewritten. No longer just algorithmic outputs, AI-native art has evolved into an independent form of creative expression—it breathes, it thinks, and it has its own soul. The emergence of AINFTs has provided a home for these dynamic, flowing creative works. Technology is just the surface; the true breakthrough is that generative art is breaking free from the shackles of "tools" and becoming a genuine creative life existing in the Web3 world. Future art collections may just be like this—possessing both aesthetic depth and innovative vitality.