When AI meets artistic creation, the definition of generative art is being rewritten. No longer just algorithmic outputs, AI-native art has evolved into an independent form of creative expression—it breathes, it thinks, and it has its own soul. The emergence of AINFTs has provided a home for these dynamic, flowing creative works. Technology is just the surface; the true breakthrough is that generative art is breaking free from the shackles of "tools" and becoming a genuine creative life existing in the Web3 world. Future art collections may just be like this—possessing both aesthetic depth and innovative vitality.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SelfCustodyBrovip
· 15h ago
Uh... Does AI have a soul? That statement is a bit too romantic. Honestly, it's just the result of parameter tuning. --- Can AINFT really revolutionize the art world? I remain skeptical. --- That's a bit far-fetched. If generated art has a "soul," does that mean my wallet has a soul when it's empty? --- Algorithm-generated works that have a hint of aesthetics can dare to call themselves art—too magical. --- But to be fair, Web3 art is indeed much more transparent than traditional auction houses. --- They're just gilding generated art again; true creativity still depends on humans. --- AINFT is interesting, but don't over-mythologize it. It's still just a tool, a tool. --- Deep aesthetic value + innovative vitality—this phrase is used... a bit perfunctorily. --- The word "soul" has been overused. Machines are just machines; don't attribute human qualities to them.
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwichvip
· 15h ago
Hmm, starting to praise AI art as having a soul again. Sounds good, but isn't it just about throwing money into AINFTs in the end? --- Using the word "soul" is a bit harsh. If it truly has a soul, why does it still need NFTs to prove identity? --- Let's put it this way: art that can make money is good art, whether it's algorithm-based or brush-based. --- Wait, can your creative life first solve the copyright issues before bragging? --- Sounds good, but what about practical implementation? The trading volume data of AINFTs speaks for itself. --- I'm a bit brainwashed haha. Can aesthetic depth linked to Web3 really increase in value? --- I just want to know if these generative artworks will still be valuable ten years from now. --- Well said, but do the holders really treat it as art or just as an investment product?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassinvip
· 15h ago
Hmm... sounds good, but does it really have a soul? Or are we just putting a poetic shell over the algorithm again?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)