HashKey successfully listed, which is undoubtedly an important milestone. But the question is—what's next?
For Hong Kong's blockchain industry, this also represents a breakthrough in a certain stage. However, the reality is that Hong Kong's regulatory pace has always lagged behind the US, and this gap is gradually widening. The US has already established a relatively clear policy framework in the digital asset sector, while Hong Kong is still in the exploratory stage.
This naturally raises the question: what is the future path for Hong Kong's blockchain industry? Should it continue to follow the US's regulatory approach, or explore its own differentiated path? Should it increase technological investment to capture the ecosystem high ground, or focus on solidifying infrastructure and talent reserves first?
These questions have no simple answers, but they are certainly worth serious consideration by industry participants and policymakers. The listing of an exchange is far from the end; it is a new beginning.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
1
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DuckFluff
· 18h ago
Is listing on Hashkey all there is to it? That's funny. Why is Hong Kong still so slow?
---
The regulatory gap is widening, comparing to the US is like turtle speed... We need to think about our own path.
---
Instead of celebrating the listing, it's better to first solidify the infrastructure, or it’s just a show of bravado.
---
Hong Kong feels awkward in the gaps, whether to follow or not to follow, both are uncomfortable.
---
What can a single exchange listing change? The key is when the policies will finally open up.
HashKey successfully listed, which is undoubtedly an important milestone. But the question is—what's next?
For Hong Kong's blockchain industry, this also represents a breakthrough in a certain stage. However, the reality is that Hong Kong's regulatory pace has always lagged behind the US, and this gap is gradually widening. The US has already established a relatively clear policy framework in the digital asset sector, while Hong Kong is still in the exploratory stage.
This naturally raises the question: what is the future path for Hong Kong's blockchain industry? Should it continue to follow the US's regulatory approach, or explore its own differentiated path? Should it increase technological investment to capture the ecosystem high ground, or focus on solidifying infrastructure and talent reserves first?
These questions have no simple answers, but they are certainly worth serious consideration by industry participants and policymakers. The listing of an exchange is far from the end; it is a new beginning.