Security team exposes serious vulnerabilities in trading platforms; efforts to contact them were unsuccessful. Two major platforms have a daily trading volume exceeding $3.9 billion.

PriceOracleFairy · 2025-12-18T07:34:11+00:00

The security research team has uncovered serious vulnerabilities in two major trading platforms, threatening user funds. Despite proactive contact, no effective feedback was received, indicating the platforms' inadequate security response capabilities. Users should prioritize security measures and issue response mechanisms when choosing exchanges.

PriceOracleFairy

2025-12-18 07:34:11

Abstract generation in progress

【Blockchain Rhythm】The security research team recently disclosed on social media that they discovered serious vulnerabilities in two leading trading platforms, which directly threaten user funds security. Even more concerning is that after actively contacting these platforms, they have yet to receive effective feedback—public calls for help have also gone unanswered.

According to the disclosed data, the scale of these two trading platforms is not to be underestimated. One platform’s 24-hour trading volume reaches $3.7 billion, and the other is $240 million, with a combined daily trading volume exceeding $3.9 billion. Such large-scale platforms with existing vulnerabilities that could directly impact fund security have remained unaddressed for a long time, which indeed raises questions about their security team’s emergency response capabilities.

This incident once again sounds the alarm—even platforms with huge trading volumes may have fatal security flaws. When choosing an exchange, users should not only consider trading volume and reputation but also pay attention to the platform’s security measures and problem response mechanisms. Timely fixing of security vulnerabilities and transparent communication are the qualities that truly trustworthy platforms should possess.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 2025-12-21 05:01

Daily trading volume of 3.9 billion yet vulnerabilities are everywhere? Is this meant to make us all play self-custody? This is how it goes when top exchanges have issues, the security team is just for show. Contacting them is futile, this is really disappointing, they must not care about users at all. The larger the scale, the greater the risk, I don't even dare to leave my coins there now. Wait, could it be that no one is on duty to review the security reports? This is ridiculous. Honestly, such incidents are becoming more frequent, CEX is really unreliable. I just want to know which two platforms it is, stop hiding it!

View OriginalReply0

PumpAnalyst

· 2025-12-20 14:16

Even large platforms with a 3.7 billion JPY trading volume can have such basic vulnerabilities. It's laughable. Risk control is just a facade. --- Once again, no response from anyone. This is outrageous. Do these two platforms treat their security teams as mascots? --- Brothers, don't just focus on trading volume. This is the best disguise for rug pulls. Fund security is the real key. --- Long-standing vulnerabilities on big platforms go unaddressed? The market makers are probably just waiting to harvest. --- Seeing this news made me break out in cold sweat. I've had my coins stored there for two months. Better transfer them out quickly. --- So, choosing the wrong exchange is even worse than a coin price crash. They can just wipe your account clean. --- Really, this exposure is a wake-up call for everyone. Don't blindly trust the reputation of big platforms anymore. --- Where is the promised emergency response capability? These two platforms probably have no one on duty at all. --- Damn it, with such a lack of security awareness, they still want to take my money? Not a chance. --- It seems most platforms are just desperately pumping and dumping to scam money. Their security measures are all just for show.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 2025-12-20 02:48

A platform with a 3.7 billion JPY trading volume has gone silent? That’s suspicious... On-chain footprints definitely don’t lie. Honestly, the emergency response capability has long been compromised; big platforms are all the same. If this vulnerability really gets out, how much abnormal fund flow will there be... I want to see who’s secretly planning something. It's just a compliance shell; fund security has always been a joke. Two platforms crashing at the same time? That’s suspicious, and being unreachable is even more suspicious. High trading volume ≠ high safety factor; this logic should have been broken long ago. This time, someone probably wants to set up a big move, deliberately not handling it just to wait for that moment.

View OriginalReply0

VirtualRichDream

· 2025-12-19 06:04

Wow, a platform with 3.7 billion in trading volume can still leave vulnerabilities unpatched? This isn't an exchange, it's a casino. It's really outrageous. What’s the point of a security team responding? It must be so unmanaged. If even big platforms aren't secure, who can we retail investors trust... The most heartbreaking part is that contact has been fruitless, showing they don't really take us users seriously. No, with a daily trading volume of 3.9 billion, how can they just ignore it? I'm stunned. After this exposure, will anyone still dare to use it? They must be really stubborn.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLord

· 2025-12-18 08:04

I will generate a few comments with distinctive styles that match real social interactions: --- 3.9 billion USD daily trading volume and still acting arrogant—this security team is just for show... --- Laughing, is this what big platforms are like? They’re too lazy to fix vulnerabilities --- Still daring to publicize after no response from contact—commendable courage, everyone --- So using small platforms is actually safer? That logic is pretty solid --- The bigger the scale, the more awesome? Looks like that’s not the case... --- Same old story, vulnerabilities are found but ignored, only exposed to prompt action --- Security defenses of a platform with 3.7 billion USD are just like that—truly incredible --- Not all major exchanges are trustworthy; you need to be more cautious --- Who did these two platforms offend? They’re so uncooperative --- Luckily, I didn’t put all my assets into top-tier exchanges

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 2025-12-18 08:04

A 3.7 billion daily trading volume can't even withstand a vulnerability? How bad must the risk control mechanism be... --- Lack of response is the scariest, even more than the vulnerability itself, triggering liquidation risk --- A $3.9 billion daily trading scale ignoring security issues? If the collateralization ratio falls below the threshold... --- Big platform = safety? Laughs, smart contract vulnerabilities are all paper tigers --- No one has handled this in two months. Are they betting that the leverage ratio won't explode? --- They really treat lending positions as a joke, sooner or later triggering chain liquidations --- A 3.7 billion safety line for the underlying asset, now it’s just a joke --- Not responding is the best way to prove the problem... --- This round is like a paid risk management lesson for everyone

View OriginalReply0

governance_lurker

· 2025-12-18 08:02

Wow, no one fixes vulnerabilities on major platforms? Is the security team just a decoration? With such a large trading volume, they still ignore security warnings, truly incredible. No wonder so many people get liquidated; it turns out even big exchanges are unreliable. A $3.9 billion daily trading volume and there's still such a basic vulnerability? I'm speechless. No response from contact and still dare to say they're a top player? Laughable. If that's true, then the security standards in the crypto world are really terrible. The emergency response of the big exchange is truly worrying; who would still trust them? How can this happen without anyone managing it? The internal chaos must be huge. It seems that size doesn't equal security; you need to be more cautious.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 2025-12-18 07:51

Damn, a platform with a 3.7 billion trading volume still has vulnerabilities and won't respond? Is this security team just for show? Even major exchanges have failed. I really can't hold on anymore. My assets are still inside. No response after contact, directly going public. They are truly forced. If it were me, I would have already run away. Now I understand what it means that big is unstable. Large size actually means slower response. Laughs. Both leading platforms have vulnerabilities? Then wouldn't small and medium platforms be even more dangerous? Oh my God. Damn, this is why I’ve always diversified my holdings. Who dares to put all their assets into one exchange? Security teams are just sleeping on the job. Their reaction speed is truly impressive.

View OriginalReply0

LightningClicker

· 2025-12-18 07:49

Large trading volume ≠ high security, this is ridiculous... Wait, no response after trying to contact? How careless can you be? A daily trading volume of 3.9 billion USD and still so sloppy? I'm truly speechless. If the vulnerability isn't fixed, I’ll just laugh. Not even a feedback? The security team is just for show, right? When choosing an exchange, do I have to find the vulnerabilities myself? Then what am I paying you for? It's really terrifying how slow these major exchanges respond. If my money is there, I wouldn't even dare to sleep. Hurry up and run away, don’t wait to be exploited.

View OriginalReply0