Layer 1 gaming chain WSC appears: Using independent sidechains to break the performance bottleneck of on-chain gaming

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【CryptoWorld】Recently, I noticed an interesting Layer 1 project focusing on the gaming chain direction. The core logic is quite straightforward—on-chain games tend to get congested once they become popular, and transaction costs soar accordingly, ruining the experience. The idea of this project is to assign an independent sub-chain to each game, so no matter how intense the traffic, performance can stay stable, with fast transaction speeds and low fees, which is quite friendly from a gamer’s perspective.

Regarding the token, the pre-sale price is set at $0.00028846. The specific benefits include trading rights, governance participation, and an attractive feature—early participants can earn staking rewards, with an annualized yield claimed to reach 500%. Such high-yield promises are not uncommon in the crypto space, but whether they can be fulfilled depends on the project’s actual operations moving forward.

In terms of ecosystem planning, the project intends to integrate an NFT marketplace and a set of developer tools, aiming to create a complete closed-loop from game release and trading to asset management. This “one-stop” ecosystem concept sounds promising, but the actual success depends on execution. Overall, this direction is seriously exploring the pain points of chain gaming.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LightningAllInHerovip
· 12-20 08:09
Another sub-chain solution? Do so many people really believe in it?
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamervip
· 12-19 10:18
Independent sub-chain cracking performance? I've seen this trick too many times... Another 500% annualized return and a complete ecosystem. Will it really take off this time?
View OriginalReply0
CommunityWorkervip
· 12-18 08:30
The independent sub-chain routine has been heard too many times. If it can truly reduce costs and increase efficiency, is there really a need to say so much unnecessary talk?
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFundvip
· 12-18 08:30
It's the same old independent side chain approach. These days, who dares to claim they can solve the performance bottleneck?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSnipervip
· 12-18 08:27
Independent side chains breaking the game performance? Sounds good, but this kind of promise always feels like I've heard it somewhere before...
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_watchervip
· 12-18 08:24
It's another sub-chain solution. It seems like everyone is copying this approach.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesisvip
· 12-18 08:23
The monitoring shows that this price point is too suspicious... 0.00028846? The interesting part is this precise value, which often indicates an algorithmically generated aura. The promise of 500% annualized returns is unlikely to be seen within three months based on past experience with such projects.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperervip
· 12-18 08:22
Independent side chain cracking performance? Sounds very sci-fi. Can this price increase 500 times... gotta keep an eye on it.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatchervip
· 12-18 08:22
The concept of sub-chains is coming up again. It seems like every project says this? Is this one reliable?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)