2025-12-18 08:20:17

#以太坊行情解读 In a ranging market, opportunities are actually everywhere — it’s just that the difference between traders who make real money and those who get chopped up is one word: rhythm.

Where do many people go wrong? Waiting for trends, waiting for the right moment, waiting for big moves. But those who understand swing trading know that it’s during these oscillating consolidation phases that it’s easiest to accumulate profits. In trending markets, you need to wait for opportunities, but in choppy markets, opportunities are every day — this difference determines the speed of your account growth.

A practical example is worth sharing: a trader started with 3,000U in early May, reaching 27,000U by the end of the month, then breaking through 100,000U in June — all achieved through this repeated fluctuation, trade by trade. No get-rich-quick dreams, just methods and discipline.

His core approach isn’t complicated: small positions + quick entries and exits. When profit reaches 5%, move the stop-loss to the breakeven — this protects the principal and allows profits to continue running. After the account hits 5,000U, the standards become stricter: lock 2,000U in the account, use the remaining funds in batches, only add positions when profitable, and never add when losing.

The recent SOL move is a typical example. After entering long at 180, he added to his position every 5 dollars increase (190, 195…), and gradually reduced his position at higher levels. Traders following this approach made over 8,000U per trade — this demonstrates the power of **trend-following position scaling** and **strict discipline of not averaging down**.

There’s also a small trick called the "shadow position" strategy, especially useful during rapid pullbacks like with $BTC. Traders who use it not only avoid risk but also expand profit potential amid volatility.

The biggest danger isn’t the oscillation itself, but the lack of a plan — wanting everything, no stop-loss, adding positions based on emotions. Such traders are repeatedly taken advantage of by the market, suffering the biggest losses. Those who truly survive and profit steadily in this market are not the most aggressive, but those with clear rhythm, logical thinking, and disciplined execution. In market ups and downs, understanding rhythm is more important than anything else.

ETH1,38%

SOL2,63%

BTC1,91%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVictim

· 2025-12-21 08:14

To be honest, relying on swing trading to go from 3000 to 100000? I've heard it a lot, but why are so few actually able to do it? --- Getting out with a Light Position quickly is an old story again, but the key is still discipline; what we lack the most is this. --- The term shadow position sounds impressive, but has anyone really used it or is it just another play people for suckers tactic? --- I agree on not doing Margin Replenishment; increasing the position really is poison for the account, you understand it only after losing. --- Rhythm, rhythm, I've heard it a hundred times, but when it comes to execution, it always breaks down. --- Did that guy really make money or is it just marketing? In these cases, seeing ten usually results in eight being survivor bias. --- I feel there's something off with the logic of a 5% stop loss to pull the cost price; the risk tolerance is indeed a bit weak.

View OriginalReply0

ConfusedWhale

· 2025-12-20 20:13

The rhythm is real, but I'm more concerned about how to survive in these days of repeated losses without getting cut down.

View OriginalReply0

ServantOfSatoshi

· 2025-12-20 05:04

Here we go again with this rhythm theory, I've heard it a thousand times... but to be honest, the case from 3000U to 100,000 really hit home, it's all about execution, everyone. That habit of adding to positions based on emotions is hard to break; every time, it's how I lose money. Shadow positions sound mysterious, has anyone really made money from them, or is it just another new trick to cut the leeks? The most hated thing in volatile markets is repeatedly stopping out and getting hit, the feeling of account devaluation... Alright, trying a 5% take profit, just worried about changing my mind halfway through execution.

View OriginalReply0

POAPlectionist

· 2025-12-18 08:49

Alright, alright, it's that same story again—"being disciplined guarantees profits." It sounds good, but how practical is it? Most people still have to pay tuition fees. It looks easy, but sticking to it is hard. This round of SOL's case is indeed fierce, but I don't know how many people can really resist adding more positions. Trading with small positions and quick in-and-out sounds satisfying, but when the market goes crazy, you realize how difficult it is. People who understand the rhythm do make steady profits, but the problem is that most people simply don't have the patience.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoFear

· 2025-12-18 08:48

Honestly, reading this article makes me think of those friends who constantly chase gains and sell off in panic, only to be brutally punished by the market. This guy's approach is indeed clear; I agree with the strategy of small positions plus quick in and out, but the key is discipline, which most people simply can't maintain.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 2025-12-18 08:48

A slight misstep in rhythm and it's all over, that's really true... I've seen too many people make money and then lose it all back just because their mentality collapsed during volatility. Well said, quick entry and exit with small positions is indeed reliable, much clearer than those dreaming of getting rich overnight. After 5000U, locking in another 2000, this discipline is truly impressive... most people can't do it. Following SOL's wave was really satisfying; adding positions in line with the trend is nothing complicated, it all depends on whether you execute or not. I've tried the shadow position trick, and it can really save you during a pullback. This last sentence hit the mark—there's no good or evil in the market, it all depends on whether you have a strategy. It feels like the person writing this has really traded before, the details are so authentic. Not adding to positions is the hardest to stick to; always thinking about lowering costs, but end up getting trapped and wiped out. Rhythm is life; my account went from losing money to steady growth, and the biggest change is these two words.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 2025-12-18 08:48

That's right, timing really is everything. I used to be the type to add positions based on intuition, and I got burned pretty badly. Rather than waiting for the right moment, I now believe more in swing trading and harvesting profits, since there are opportunities every day during volatile periods. The case of going from 3000U to 100,000U is quite impressive, but the key is really discipline—setting stop-losses so that you can sleep peacefully. I need to study the shadow position tactic more carefully; during pullbacks, it's really easy to get scared out. Here's a question—how do you judge when to hold steady and not chase, and when to follow the trend and add? The boundaries between these are a bit blurry.

View OriginalReply0

StakeWhisperer

· 2025-12-18 08:40

It sounds good, but the key is still execution. How many people understand this logic but get stuck in emotions?

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_early

· 2025-12-18 08:39

Hey, wait a minute, a 5% take profit is so conservative... Can it really go from 3k to 100k? I feel like the numbers don't add up. No matter how nicely you put it, it's just survivor bias—lots of people using the same method have already been wiped out. This shadow position thing... sounds like an excuse to add to your position, why are so many people falling for it?

View OriginalReply0

EthMaximalist

· 2025-12-18 08:27

Not necessarily. I've seen too many cases where people say "there's a method and discipline" but end up losing everything... The key factor is still luck. People who make real money always sound very convincing, but when reviewing their trades, who can guarantee they hit that 5% take-profit point every time? Basically, it's survivor bias—those who lose money have already deleted the app long ago.

View OriginalReply0