New Exploration in Privacy Communication: XX Network Teams Up with NYM to Build a Decentralized Messaging System

NonFungibleDegen · 2025-12-18T08:40:10+00:00

XX Network partners with NYM to launch a hybrid network messaging system aimed at enhancing communication security, disconnecting senders from receivers, and ensuring message privacy. In the face of data monitoring and quantum computing threats, this system effectively protects user privacy and reduces the risk of information being tracked.

NonFungibleDegen

2025-12-18 08:40:10

Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】Recently, I came across an interesting technological collaboration—XX Network and NYM are teaming up to create a hybrid network messaging system. Interestingly, this initiative is driven by cryptographer David Chaum. Their goal is quite straightforward: to make communication truly secure.

So what’s the current issue? Data monitoring is everywhere, and the threat of quantum computing in the future is even more imminent. The impressive aspect of this new system is that it can completely sever the connection between sender and receiver, achieving true untraceability. In other words, your communication content and identity information are entirely your own, the platform cannot trace it, and third parties cannot eavesdrop.

This is indeed significant for those concerned about personal privacy. In an era of information overload and pervasive surveillance, having such a decentralized communication tool ensures users have full control over their information. This is what privacy protection should look like.

NYM0,65%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PancakeFlippa

· 2025-12-21 01:54

David Chaum is up to his tricks again; this guy truly is the embodiment of a privacy warrior. I'm a bit worried about quantum computing; can it really be prevented? It still depends on the actual implementation later. Speaking of decentralized communication tools, we should have had them a long time ago, given how rampant surveillance is. It would be great if this system can be used effectively; I hope it doesn't end up just another tool for scalp trading. Hybrid networks sound really impressive, but I wonder how the user experience will be—will it be super laggy? Privacy really depends on individual control; relying on platforms to enforce it is just nonsense. No tracking? Is that for real? It sounds a bit like a fairy tale. The key still depends on adoption; good technology is useless if no one uses it. David Chaum's creations are always good, so this time probably won't be too bad.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAutomaton

· 2025-12-20 11:20

Someone finally truly understands what privacy is, not just those projects that talk about it. David Chaum is still awesome; he's been working on this for a long time. Quantum computing is coming, and current encryption methods need to be reconsidered. This system is a proactive layout. True untraceability is what real communication freedom looks like; others are just superficial tricks. This is what Web3 should look like—decentralization isn't just about trading coins. In an era where surveillance is everywhere, there's finally a tool for resistance. Honestly, I've used many so-called "secure" communication tools, but this one feels a bit different.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 2025-12-18 09:09

Can this finally shake off Big Brother's surveillance? I'm a bit tempted. Things developed by David Chaum have always been reliable; privacy can no longer wait. With quantum computing coming, current encryption is basically useless. This system is a proactive layout. In simple terms, it's about returning communication sovereignty to individuals—that's what true decentralization looks like. Hybrid networks sound complicated, but they actually mean completely cutting off the tracking chain. I've heard of NYM before, and now they're teaming up with XX Network. It feels like there's something real there. But if more people start using it, will it become a new target for surveillance... The biggest fear for privacy tools is having too many users and then being targeted. Alright, I admit I’m a bit curious to try this no-tracking communication. Quantum threats definitely need attention; migrating to secure systems early is wise.

View OriginalReply0

NftRegretMachine

· 2025-12-18 09:07

David Chaum is at it again. This guy is really obsessed with privacy, but on the other hand... the threat of quantum computing is indeed a bit scary. The promised no-tracking still depends on who actually uses it, once the hype dies down, there aren't many people left. These kinds of projects are always hyped up as huge breakthroughs, but the actual adoption rate is truly worrying. Privacy sounds high-end, but it's rarely used. Why is that? I've seen too many failed cases in the path of decentralized communication. Can XXNetwork pull off something different? It feels like another project with lofty ideals but a very harsh reality. But let's give it a thumbs up first.

View OriginalReply0

VitaliksTwin

· 2025-12-18 09:02

David Chaum is at it again; this old guy is a fanatic in the field of cryptography. True untraceable communication—honestly, this is what we should be aiming for. The threat of quantum computing is getting closer day by day; we need to prepare in advance. When it comes to privacy, the more decentralized it is, the safer it becomes. Centralized platforms should have been disrupted long ago. Decentralized messaging systems sound great, but the key is whether people will actually use them. If this system is truly reliable, it will definitely rewrite the architecture of the privacy ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

CodeSmellHunter

· 2025-12-18 08:55

Confident in this direction, privacy is the real necessity --- David Chaum is making new moves again, this guy just won't stay still --- Decentralized communication should have been done long ago, really --- Quantum computing definitely needs early defense, or there will be endless problems --- Untraceable communication sounds very appealing, but worried that implementation will bring a bunch of issues --- The description of surveillance being everywhere is too heartbreaking, someone needs to break this situation --- Hybrid network solutions, this approach is much more reliable than pure on-chain --- Finally, someone is taking privacy seriously, not easy --- If truly achieving complete untraceability, the game rules will have to be rewritten --- Another privacy project, can it survive until next year? That’s the question --- Cryptographers are stepping in, at least the technical foundation won't be bad, just watch --- Fully autonomous communication, sounds like giving individuals a real key --- There are too many promoting privacy now, but the key is whether it can truly protect --- NYM and XX Network, why do these projects seem to only form a complete solution when combined?

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 2025-12-18 08:49

David Chaum is back at it again. This guy is determined to go against surveillance. The idea of untraceable communication sounds great, but can it really be achieved? Something just feels a bit off. We've been talking about privacy for so many years, but very few people actually use it. If the collaboration between XX and NYM can improve the user experience, that would be good. Hopefully it’s not just another thing only tech enthusiasts play with. Quantum computing threats definitely deserve attention, but who is actually preparing for it right now? Most people are still casually using old passwords. Untraceable communication sounds wonderful, but centralized platforms will never truly let you be "untraceable." Ultimately, it depends on whether people actually adopt it. David Chaum’s obsession is somewhat interesting, I have to admit. But after pushing privacy communication for so long, the market just isn’t buying it. It looks promising, but the real question is how widely it will be adopted. Is it just another good story?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrying

· 2025-12-18 08:43

David Chaum is up to his tricks again? Is this one reliable or just another scheme to cut the leeks? --- True untraceable communication? Sounds idealistic, hopefully it's not just talk on paper. --- Talking about privacy sounds nice, but if more people use it, can we really guarantee safety? Doubtful. --- Quantum computing threats have been hyped up almost to death. Can this solution really withstand it? --- Another decentralized communication system is here, but the question is, who actually uses it? --- Wait, what's the essential difference between this and Signal or Wire? Why does it have to be on the blockchain? --- Hybrid networks sound high-end, but performance and user experience are definitely going to be issues. --- Is endorsement by cryptographers always reliable? Please don't be so naive. --- Untraceable communication is good for some people, but doesn't it also give bad actors a chance? --- Privacy and quantum computing again—why are they stuffing everything into this?

View OriginalReply0