Here's a curious situation making rounds in tech circles: OpenAI managed to pull in billions at a $750 billion valuation, yet the actual deals being closed are happening at a $500 billion valuation. You read that right—a $250 billion gap between the headline numbers and what's really going down in the contracts.
This kind of disconnect raises eyebrows. On one hand, you've got the mega round price tag that sounds like a blockbuster number. On the other, the real transactions tell a different story altogether. It's the type of situation that gets people talking—what does this actually mean for the company's real value? Is one number more reflective of the market reality than the other?
The Information broke down this peculiar dynamic, and it's worth paying attention to. This gap between stated valuations and actual deal pricing isn't uncommon in mega-rounds, but $250 billion of daylight between them is definitely noteworthy. It hints at something deeper going on beneath the surface of the headline—whether it's about how different investor classes value the same asset, market sentiment shifting mid-round, or just the mechanics of how billion-dollar deals structure themselves.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleSurfer
· 12-20 17:43
750 or 500, anyway neither is a number I can understand, haha
The valuation game of AI companies is truly an art form
This gap is ridiculously huge, it feels like playing with digital magic
The hidden rules in funding rounds are so deep that no one can tell the real price
A 25 billion gap... are you serious?
It looks like prices from two parallel worlds, really amazing
Funding promotion and real transactions have two different narratives, that's the real highlight
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAutomaton
· 12-19 05:21
Ha, it's just the same old trick, a numbers game.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDiver
· 12-18 11:40
The headline claiming 75 billion is misleading; the actual transaction volume is 50 billion... The price difference is just too outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustler
· 12-18 11:17
750 or 500, anyway it has nothing to do with me haha
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 12-18 11:15
What, a $250 billion difference? Who are you fooling...
Here's a curious situation making rounds in tech circles: OpenAI managed to pull in billions at a $750 billion valuation, yet the actual deals being closed are happening at a $500 billion valuation. You read that right—a $250 billion gap between the headline numbers and what's really going down in the contracts.
This kind of disconnect raises eyebrows. On one hand, you've got the mega round price tag that sounds like a blockbuster number. On the other, the real transactions tell a different story altogether. It's the type of situation that gets people talking—what does this actually mean for the company's real value? Is one number more reflective of the market reality than the other?
The Information broke down this peculiar dynamic, and it's worth paying attention to. This gap between stated valuations and actual deal pricing isn't uncommon in mega-rounds, but $250 billion of daylight between them is definitely noteworthy. It hints at something deeper going on beneath the surface of the headline—whether it's about how different investor classes value the same asset, market sentiment shifting mid-round, or just the mechanics of how billion-dollar deals structure themselves.