2025-12-18 11:27:57

The security organization SlowMist recently exposed serious system vulnerabilities in two exchanges, one involving a trading volume of $3.7 billion, and the other $240 million. More concerning is that these exchanges have taken no remedial measures to date.

Based on data benchmarking analysis, BitradeX and ICRYPEX best match these data characteristics. The security defenses of such small trading platforms clearly have fatal flaws.

A warning to all users active on these small exchanges: you must pay close attention to fund security issues. Do not keep large assets on platforms with weak security systems; the risk factor far exceeds your imagination. The exchanges' passive response to the vulnerability exposure is undoubtedly testing the trust bottom line of investors.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeadTrades_Walking

· 2025-12-18 11:58

Yeah, these two exchanges are really outrageous. They don't fix vulnerabilities, who dares to put money in there? --- Small exchanges are like this, their security defenses are virtually nonexistent. When large amounts go in, just wait to get cut. --- I've long stopped dealing with BitradeX. Their passive response just shows their attitude. --- A trading volume of 3.7 billion and they remain indifferent? How arrogant is that? --- I don't understand why people are still active on these platforms. Are they really risking their lives? --- Just say it, whether small exchanges fix vulnerabilities or not doesn't matter. No one can do anything to them anyway. --- Users on that side should liquidate their holdings now. Don't wait until things really blow up to regret it. --- These kinds of exchanges are a joke. SlowMist should have already named and shamed them directly, no more hiding. --- No one will back your funds' safety. Small platforms have always been like casinos. --- It turns out they are just betting on investors having to gamble. Fixing vulnerabilities costs money anyway.

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceWatcher

· 2025-12-18 11:53

Small exchanges really dare to play like this... Not fixing a 3.7 billion loophole, they truly don't take users seriously --- Another small platform crashes, when will the security issues in the crypto circle improve --- I have friends using BitradeX, now they're panicked and quickly transferred out --- Every time it's just exposure and then no follow-up, is the exchange waiting for the hype to die down --- Regarding fund security, it seems I have to be more vigilant, don't rely on them --- Ignoring a $240 million loophole... that takes some guts --- I just want to know why these platforms can be so arrogant, where is the regulation --- The tricks of small exchanges are really the same, when something happens they just play dead

View OriginalReply0

RumbleValidator

· 2025-12-18 11:52

A $3.7 billion vulnerability left unpatched—how outrageous is the system architecture design... Node validation is essentially useless, and this risk level is truly maxed out.

View OriginalReply0

orphaned_block

· 2025-12-18 11:43

Damn, these two platforms really aren't taking security seriously, waiting until something happens before acting? Small exchanges are like this—it's always the right move to withdraw your funds quickly when there's more money involved. SlowMist's exposure this time was timely; otherwise, it would have been a total loss.

View OriginalReply0