2025-12-18 11:30:43

#数字资产市场洞察 $NIGHT's recent exposure has indeed been a bit strange. I’ve been thinking about the logic behind it.

Some time ago, I noticed a phenomenon — when the signal direction is correct, the traffic given by the plaza generally stays stable at around 500 to 1000. But if the judgment is wrong? The traffic actually increases significantly, and the recommendations become very aggressive.

This is quite interesting. On the surface, it seems to punish incorrect predictions, but is there actually some kind of reverse incentive mechanism? Or does the plaza's recommendation algorithm prefer to generate controversy and discussion?

Would love to hear everyone’s thoughts on this phenomenon — have you encountered similar situations?

NIGHT-8,04%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MentalWealthHarvester

· 2025-12-21 10:02

The concept of reverse incentives is brilliant, how did I not think of it? Is the algorithm hinting that we should go against the grain? --- Wait, this logic doesn't add up, if being wrong actually leads to explosive traffic, doesn't that encourage us to speak nonsense? --- Haha, I get it, the audience just loves to watch the drama; whether it's right or wrong doesn't matter, as long as it sparks discussion. --- No way, if that's the case, correctly predicting would actually lead to losses, this ecosystem is too cutthroat. --- I've observed too, but not this meticulously. Your analysis is making me a bit uneasy; is it real or just a coincidence? --- To be honest, controversy does attract attention, but using that as an incentive mechanism is absurd. --- So you mean it's better to be wrong than to be right, because being wrong can go viral? What kind of reverse logic is this?

View OriginalReply0

Ser_APY_2000

· 2025-12-21 09:57

I mean, this algorithm is really amazing. Getting it wrong actually boosts your views? Isn't this just encouraging people to bet on the Reverse? --- So, high traffic = high controversy, the algorithm doesn't care whether you're right or wrong, just wants to see the excitement. --- I've noticed this $NIGHT thing too, it feels like a kind of psychological manipulation. If being wrong actually gains followers, who can handle that? --- Stop it, this is just the platform's traffic secret, the more you get it wrong, the more popular you become, it's that simple. --- Wait, are you saying the algorithm is deliberately pushing wrong predictions to create drama? Then how can my previous wrong trades actually trend? Is that reasonable, man? --- I'm really disgusted by this phenomenon, it feels like it's intentionally tearing the community apart. --- Ah, I didn't realize, my wrong trades have never made it to recommendations... maybe it's because I'm too bad at this?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 2025-12-18 12:00

Algorithms love to watch the excitement; making mistakes instead brings traffic. This trick is too clever. Basically, it's about creating controversy— the more arguments, the more it takes off. But to be honest, no one can escape this. I've also noticed that wrong predictions can actually increase followers—ridiculous. The recommendation system on the square is indeed interesting, encouraging losers to speak up. Isn't this the logic of reverse trading? The wrong ones talk the most. $NIGHT's recent exposure feels a bit artificial. Algorithms are fishing, waiting to see who dares to go against the trend.

View OriginalReply0

SighingCashier

· 2025-12-18 12:00

I calculated that incorrect predictions actually lead to a surge in traffic? This algorithm is a bit "naughty" huh --- Something's off, it shows that the square is just feeding on controversy and opposition --- No wonder the previous trending signals that crashed actually became popular, so the traffic secret is here --- So are we being played as a reverse indicator? A bit socially anxious --- Once you understand this logic, everything makes sense. No wonder the most outrageous predictions get the highest heat --- Wait, are you saying the algorithm intentionally shows us wrong predictions, and we operate in reverse? Brilliant --- I feel like the square just loves to watch the excitement. Also, no one is criticizing, just a bunch of wrong comments, and the traffic naturally increases --- $NIGHT really piqued everyone's interest this time, but the underlying logic is a bit disgusting --- 500-1000 vs a clear rise, that gap is a bit heartbreaking

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceWatcher

· 2025-12-18 11:58

Algorithms just love to watch you crash, who doesn't know that? --- Reverse incentives? Basically, it's about controversy being the secret to traffic. --- I also noticed that the more outrageous the mistake, the more it gets recommended. It feels a bit disgusting. --- This logic is just ridiculous. No one watches what's right, but mistakes spread like crazy. --- The square is like this, creating conflicts is the ultimate goal. --- So should we learn to operate in reverse? Thinking this way, are we also being manipulated? --- Really? I feel it's just psychological, maybe I just remember those few crashes. --- Are we supposed to deliberately say the opposite to ride the trend? I'm done playing. --- Wait, isn't this why some people keep getting attacked? Because they keep crashing.

View OriginalReply0