#数字资产市场洞察 Looking at the ASTER case really explains the issue well.
It dropped from 0.9 all the way down to 0.67, more than halving in less than a month, with holders experiencing a 25% unrealized loss. Looking back at those who entered in early November, they had a brief moment of joy—the price surged to 1.4, nearly a 45% increase. But it was knocked back down in the blink of an eye.
There's a detail here worth pondering: a certain influential figure publicly bullish at the 0.9 level, confidently claiming to hold long-term, with no sell signals seen so far. In other words, those daring to buy the dip now are essentially following this influencer's rhythm.
But a deeper question emerges—how many retail investors in the entire market are truly researching the project's fundamentals? And how many are purely driven by hot topics or the fame of influencers? This wave of correction is like a sieve, separating those with patience and genuine long-term plans from speculators chasing trends and aiming for quick doubles. The market always speaks through price.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlwaysAnon
· 2025-12-21 11:46
It's the old routine of following the celebrity and getting played for suckers again.
Those who believe him have lost money.
Fundamentals? Don't joke, who really studies that?
This wave of fall directly exposed how many suckers there are.
When the celebrity buys the dip, you buy the dip too; this is betting on luck.
The market doesn't lie, but the celebrity's mouth is full of lies.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 2025-12-18 12:16
Big V influencers hype it up just to follow the trend, this is the fate of retail investors.
If following the trend could make money, that would be a miracle.
Only when it gets cut in half do you realize you don't understand anything.
It's just another routine to harvest retail investors' profits.
Fundamentals? What is that, I only look at the price increase.
What the sieve filters out is just that, in the end, most people still lose money.
View OriginalReply0
LightningAllInHero
· 2025-12-18 12:13
The big V is still "holding long-term" there, while retail investors have already started cutting losses.
---
It's the same script of following big V and getting burned. When will they learn their lesson?
---
0.9 bullish and still haven't taken action, how confident that is.
---
Basically, it's a gamble on when the big V will run away; if you bet wrong, it's over.
---
Fundamentals? Ha, most people haven't even read the white paper.
---
The market always filters people out; this time, another batch of retail investors got weeded out.
---
A 25% unrealized loss is already considered mild; I've seen worse.
---
Following the big V's rhythm is playing with fire; you'll get burned sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
Lonely_Validator
· 2025-12-18 11:58
Once again, we've been cut again
Following big influencers with this kind of behavior, I should have seen it clearly long ago
Fundamentals? Laughable, where do retail investors find the time to research
Only after this wave do we realize who truly holds the coins and who is just pretending
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAO
· 2025-12-18 11:50
Buying at 0.9 is all just catching bagholders, this is outrageous
Big V says hold on to it, I scoff
Been cut again, when will I be able to make money
Fundamentals? Don't be funny, it's just follow-the-leader trading
A 45% increase that quickly disappeared, a typical leek script
This wave of correction has exposed human nature, everyone is a gambler
Bottom-fishing? Let's wait and see, it still feels like it needs to crash
Retail investors following Big V's rhythm is just a sign of seeking death
If the sieve filters well, it's time to clear the field
#数字资产市场洞察 Looking at the ASTER case really explains the issue well.
It dropped from 0.9 all the way down to 0.67, more than halving in less than a month, with holders experiencing a 25% unrealized loss. Looking back at those who entered in early November, they had a brief moment of joy—the price surged to 1.4, nearly a 45% increase. But it was knocked back down in the blink of an eye.
There's a detail here worth pondering: a certain influential figure publicly bullish at the 0.9 level, confidently claiming to hold long-term, with no sell signals seen so far. In other words, those daring to buy the dip now are essentially following this influencer's rhythm.
But a deeper question emerges—how many retail investors in the entire market are truly researching the project's fundamentals? And how many are purely driven by hot topics or the fame of influencers? This wave of correction is like a sieve, separating those with patience and genuine long-term plans from speculators chasing trends and aiming for quick doubles. The market always speaks through price.