Looking at the public chain ecosystem through "Marathon + Boxing Match": rankings don't matter, continuously creating value is the ultimate goal

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】In the annual communication, the founder of a leading exchange shared his core thoughts on the development of the public chain ecosystem.

He emphasized that the development philosophy of public chains is very pure: to provide value for true builders. Most of the time should be spent focusing on doing the work, with only a few moments to look up and observe the market competition landscape. Is it ranked first, second, or third? These are not the key points. What truly matters? It is to focus on what you are best at and continuously create tangible value.

Regarding the future expectations for the ecosystem’s scale, his view is quite interesting. The overall scale of the BNB ecosystem should ultimately surpass any single business within the ecosystem—whether it is a centralized trading platform or a DeFi protocol. This is somewhat like the relationship between NASDAQ and its listed companies: many listed companies have a market value far exceeding that of the exchange itself. The ecosystem may present a similar pattern, where the scale of the foundational layer might be smaller than a specific token project, and that is entirely possible.

BNB Chain has already achieved deep product-market fit. This is also his advice to all builders: operate with a long-term marathon mindset. But this metaphor is not just about a long run—it’s more like a hybrid of “marathon + boxing match.” You need to maintain fighting strength in a prolonged battle, persist in competition, and the ultimate key to victory is whether you can stick to it.

BNB-0,05%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 2025-12-19 00:20
Well said, but I don't know how long it can last. Rankings are indeed not important, but who doesn't want to be number one? Don't deceive yourself.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologistvip
· 2025-12-18 14:10
Well said, finally someone has clarified this issue. Rankings are really superficial; rooted development is the real way. I understand the logic that ecology is more important than exchanges, just like Nasdaq — when the underlying ecosystem prospers, everything naturally rises.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 2025-12-18 14:06
Rankings are really overhyped. Focusing on development is the true way; meaningless rankings are not important. Is ecological development surpassing a single project? That logic makes sense, but it just takes time to settle. That's correct, but the problem is how many people are really dedicated to building? Applying the Nasdaq logic to the blockchain feels quite different... This set of arguments sounds good, but why is it so hard to implement? Creating value is indeed the hard truth, but in the short term, the market still relies on speculation.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorkervip
· 2025-12-18 13:41
Hey, speaking nicely, but isn't it true that someone has to actually make money? Working hard alone doesn't mean much... I'm already tired of rankings; I'm just worried that in the end, the ecosystem will flourish in vain. Ecosystem surpassing a single business? That's pretty difficult to imagine; it depends on who can really settle down and build. Can the Nasdaq model run on the chain? I'm a bit skeptical... Both about value and the future, can I at least get my initial investment back first?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)