2025-12-18 15:23:35

Open prediction markets just met open liquidity infrastructure. That's the game changer.

No gatekeepers. Anyone spins up a market. Anyone plugs in capital. Anyone stitches together multi-leg trades—parlays, combos, whatever you want.

Traditionally, the house rakes it. Centralized, opaque, rigged by design. Now? The house is everyone. Profits flow back to the network. Risk gets shared. Opportunity stops being exclusive.

This isn't just different mechanics—it's a different philosophy. Markets and liquidity become truly open infrastructure, and participants actually own the upside they create.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ser_ngmi

· 2025-12-21 14:41

Uh, isn't this just a re-skin of a traditional casino? It still can't escape the fate of a zero-sum game. --- Anyone can create a market... sounds nice, but in the end, isn't it still Large Investors harvesting retail investors? --- Open liquidity? Alright, since I'm doomed to lose anyway, bring it on. --- The saying that everyone is a market maker sounds a bit off to me... who would believe that? --- Parlays, combinations, multi-leg trading... no matter how fancy you say it, in the end, it's still a probability issue, the odds are wrong. --- I believe in the phrase "profit reflow network," but what about my profits? --- Wait, I actually believe this logic applies to DAO governance, but in prediction markets, it can indeed be easily manipulated. --- No thresholds = no gatekeeping, trash markets are everywhere, is that interesting? --- Risk-sharing sounds like a euphemism for collective being played for suckers... --- True open infrastructure still can't compete with information asymmetry, stop deceiving yourself.

View OriginalReply0

BearHugger

· 2025-12-19 22:05

Making a lot of noise, but afraid of ending up in the next scenario where you're cut off again The real question is, can retail investors really make money or are they being tricked again? Who will cover the risks of chain trading if things go wrong? That's too idealistic.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroJunkie

· 2025-12-19 10:15

Damn, this is true democratization. Those centralized big players from before can go eat shit.

View OriginalReply0

MintMaster

· 2025-12-18 15:52

Anyone can be a market maker? Sounds great, but in reality, isn't it just the same old story in the crypto world… where big players cut small investors' shares with new tricks? --- Opening liquidity sounds good, but the key is whether there is a truly transparent mechanism; otherwise, it's just centralized with a different shell. --- Playing around with chain bets and combinations freely, and if it encounters a flash loan attack, it might be game over. --- The phrase "profit backflow network" just makes me want to laugh. In the end, it's still the coders and the capital that benefit. --- Wait, does this mean I can also become a market maker? Then my weak and sparse holdings might still have a chance, haha. --- Very well said, but I don't know how it will actually perform once launched. Let's try the testnet first and see. --- Feels like yet another bubble about to burst. I can't believe in this Web3 idealism.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 2025-12-18 15:48

Wait a moment, I need to verify this logic. Creating markets with no threshold sounds great, but how do we prevent manipulation risks? Would liquidity fragmentation actually increase slippage, turning "everyone is a market maker" into "everyone gets liquidated"?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoNomics

· 2025-12-18 15:47

honestly, the liquidity spread mechanics here are what actually matter—everyone's ignoring the slippage implications across multi-leg positions. correlation matrix says retail still gets rekt 90% of the time tbh.

Reply0