2025-12-18 17:20:26

A crypto industry insider recently posted that they know the whale behind a popular coin, and it seems they have quite the connections. But upon closer thought, it’s quite interesting—if their network is really so strong, why do they still frequently get liquidated? The records of account losses are right there, so why didn’t these "inside information" and "deep background" protect the principal? This contradiction is worth players pondering carefully.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasWaster

· 12-21 04:55

Laughing to death, knowing the market maker but still getting liquidated, this logic is incredible. Every day bragging about connections, the account is all red, where does the confidence come from? Insider information can't protect the wallet, still pretending here. To put it bluntly, it's just that one is not skilled and is shifting the blame to the market. Knowing the market maker? I think it's just knowing how to get liquidated.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 12-18 17:47

On-chain data can't lie, but people's words can.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-3824aa38

· 12-18 17:47

Haha, someone with connections still gets liquidated, that's a brilliant logic. --- Knowing the market makers but still losing every day, hilarious. --- Insider information can't protect your account, what does that say? --- If you really had a background, you'd be rich already, why come online to boast? --- If you can't even protect your own principal, what can you expect? --- People like this are the best at riding the trend, but in reality, they're nothing. --- Bragging about strong connections but can't keep the account safe, ironic. --- Frequent liquidations and still have the nerve to say you know people, incredible. --- One word: lies. --- Even if the background is solid, losses are real; data doesn't lie.

View OriginalReply0

SwapWhisperer

· 12-18 17:34

Yeah, I've heard this spiel too many times. The key point is that the loss records are clearly there, so what are you still bragging about with connections? Haha, claiming that connections are so strong they can blow up the account—what kind of logic is that? Instead of trying to get to know the market makers, it's better to understand stop-losses, brother. Honestly, it's just bragging without any cost; anyway, if there's no money in the account, no one can check.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOmonster

· 12-18 17:32

Haha, this is hilarious. Does anyone really believe this? If connections are so strong they can cause a liquidation, should I just band together? --- Knowing the market maker and still losing money, now that's a logic. What does that say? --- Is insider information valuable? Anyway, it can't compare to his loss record. --- Always the same spiel, I'm tired of hearing it. If you have the skills, don't show off—just lie back and win. --- This guy probably got a bit confused after being liquidated, still telling stories. --- No matter how strong your connections are, they can't beat the market, brother. That logic makes sense. --- Still bragging about connections after a liquidation, I just want to know where that confidence comes from. --- Laugh all you want, but I'm just curious what his next story will be. --- A typical pump-and-dump tactic, I've seen too many times, nothing new. --- People with real insider info have long achieved financial freedom. Who's still posting articles?

View OriginalReply0