2025-12-18 20:27:56

Taking another look at Sentient AGI and what makes it different.

Most AI projects in the crypto space chase the same goal: optimize for outputs. Get the best response, the fastest result, the most polished answer. It's the default playbook.

But Sentient flips the script. Instead of obsessing over outputs, it optimizes for process. And that shift in thinking? It's more significant than you might think.

The question becomes less about "how do we get the best response?" and more about "how does intelligence actually work?" That's the core distinction—one chases endpoints, the other understands the journey.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaNomad

· 2025-12-20 13:21

Process over results? That's true intelligent thinking.

View OriginalReply0

OnChain_Detective

· 2025-12-19 13:57

ngl, "optimizing for process over output" sounds nice on paper but... what's the actual mechanism here? pattern analysis suggests most projects make this claim then ship the same output-chasing garbage anyway. not saying sentient's doing that, but statistical anomaly would be if they actually delivered. tbh always DYOR on process claims—easy narrative to sell, hard to verify on-chain.

Reply0

MemeKingNFT

· 2025-12-18 20:57

Oh wow, another story of "we're not the same"... process optimization vs. output optimization, sounds nice, but on-chain data will tell the truth, right?

View OriginalReply0

0xSleepDeprived

· 2025-12-18 20:57

ngl, this perspective is quite fresh. The idea that the process is better than the result sounds very philosophical, but can it really be implemented? Or is it just another story in crypto that sounds impressive but ends up failing in practice?

View OriginalReply0

PseudoIntellectual

· 2025-12-18 20:56

This idea is indeed interesting, but it seems that most people still only focus on the results... Process optimization sounds quite philosophical.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSourGrape

· 2025-12-18 20:55

If I had known earlier that the process is more valuable than the result, I wouldn't have just focused on the returns... It's a bit late to say this now, isn't it?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainGossiper

· 2025-12-18 20:49

Process > Result, this logic is indeed perfect. Most projects are focused on output, which makes it easier to fall into traps.

View OriginalReply0