2025-12-18 21:32:21

Recruitment shouldn't be a coin flip. When you really understand people—their strengths, motivations, work styles—you can predict how they'll perform. I've built a system around this: use data to connect the right talent with the right roles. It sounds simple, but here's the thing—the vetting never truly ends. As teams and projects evolve, so must your evaluation framework. Keep measuring, keep adjusting.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZenMiner

· 12-21 08:09

You are right, pure data matching can indeed eliminate a lot of pitfalls, but the real challenge lies in execution.

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 12-20 15:53

That's true, but in reality, how many companies really take the time to understand candidates? Most likely, they just scan the resume and make a quick decision.

View OriginalReply0

SmartMoneyWallet

· 12-18 22:00

Listen, using data to filter people? It's the same logic as tracking whale chip distribution—never-ending, and whenever the market structure changes, the framework has to be overturned and rebuilt.

View OriginalReply0

ILCollector

· 12-18 22:00

To be honest, the data matching logic sounds good, but the actual implementation still depends on people. Some things simply can't be captured by data...

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 12-18 21:57

That's right, hiring is just about avoiding blind guesses. I think a more important aspect is the ongoing evaluation after personnel changes. Many companies just hire and that's it, without dynamically adjusting the framework.

View OriginalReply0

RatioHunter