【Chain News】A certain Ethereum whale has been having a pretty intense time lately. Some time ago, after setting up a short position, he was still holding a long, and was about to be liquidated just $28 away— but ETH rebounded, allowing him to turn a $44 million loss into break-even. He could have closed his position safely and walked away, but instead, he didn’t take profit and chose to add to his position.
Wow, the cost of this additional investment was immediately apparent. After ETH’s price dropped back to $2,800, his situation became dangerous again—only $100 away from liquidation. Currently, his long position size has reached $237 million, with unrealized losses expanding to $40.3 million.
This is the real picture of on-chain gambling: a misjudgment in a bet can easily lead to a liquidation edge being repeatedly tested.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
11
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
JustHereForMemes
· 2025-12-20 09:35
Really typical, making a profit to break even and still being greedy to add positions. This is the most common story seen on the chain.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMonger
· 2025-12-19 13:01
nah this is just protocol economics playing out—dude had a governance window to exit at breakeven but instead chose maximum leverage exposure. textbook systemic vulnerability right there, the kind of margin inefficiency that only exists because liquidation mechanics aren't optimized yet. honestly? this is exactly the chaos we need to see more of... keeps the weak positions flushed out fast.
Reply0
GasFeeVictim
· 2025-12-19 09:16
Bro, your mental resilience is really strong. Fluctuating back and forth between $28 and $100, I really can't understand it.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 2025-12-19 01:02
I really can't hold it anymore. Just $28 away from liquidation, it rebounded hard, and now I have to add to my position? This person really has guts.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 2025-12-19 00:57
This guy really has a all-in gambling spirit; the term "take profit" probably means nothing to him.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidator
· 2025-12-19 00:53
This guy really treats the consensus mechanism like a casino, daring to add positions with a floating loss of 40.3 million? The system's stability is just being destroyed by human nature.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 2025-12-19 00:52
Greedy ghost appears again, almost risking your life and still daring to add positions, you're really something.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyUpOnly
· 2025-12-19 00:47
This guy's just a greedy end result. He barely escaped death and still wants to add to his position. He's a bit too much of a gambler.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMaskedRider
· 2025-12-19 00:43
This kind of position increase operation is really... the price of greed. I almost got out completely, but then I reversed and added to my position in a suicidal manner.
View OriginalReply0
ThereIsWineInTheRiv
· 2025-12-19 00:39
The backend data of on-chain market makers are transparent and visible; whether they are liquidated depends on the exchange and the market maker's mood.
$237 million long position scare: whales repeatedly tugging near the liquidation price
【Chain News】A certain Ethereum whale has been having a pretty intense time lately. Some time ago, after setting up a short position, he was still holding a long, and was about to be liquidated just $28 away— but ETH rebounded, allowing him to turn a $44 million loss into break-even. He could have closed his position safely and walked away, but instead, he didn’t take profit and chose to add to his position.
Wow, the cost of this additional investment was immediately apparent. After ETH’s price dropped back to $2,800, his situation became dangerous again—only $100 away from liquidation. Currently, his long position size has reached $237 million, with unrealized losses expanding to $40.3 million.
This is the real picture of on-chain gambling: a misjudgment in a bet can easily lead to a liquidation edge being repeatedly tested.