How the prediction market reshapes information discovery: From incentive mechanisms to market true signals

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】Prediction markets are becoming a new paradigm for information discovery. Compared to the stereotypical image of traditional sports or political betting, the true significance of these markets lies in building a signal system that is more efficient than traditional polls.

The core mechanism is simple but powerful: participants receive economic incentives for telling the truth and bear actual costs for lying. This design, in the view of executives at a leading trading platform, is precisely where prediction markets outperform traditional information channels. Policymakers can understand the real expected effects of policy implementation through market price signals, rather than relying on easily manipulated poll data.

From another perspective, prediction markets are essentially a substitute for traditional media. They do not shape public opinion through commentary or opinion editing but allow market participants to spontaneously discover, integrate, and disseminate information through genuine economic competition. When everyone’s judgment is linked to actual gains, the market automatically filters out noise and consolidates the most credible signals. This is why the consensus generated by prediction markets is often more accurate than poll data—because the incentive mechanism ensures participant honesty.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GoldDiggerDuckvip
· 2025-12-20 16:32
You're right, economic incentives are indeed more effective than anything else. --- Prediction markets sound idealistic, but the ones who really make money are still those with an information advantage. --- Hmm... this logic seems to overlook the reality that retail investors get cut. --- I agree that polls are more credible, but the premise is that participants must be rational enough. Is that possible? --- Oh boy, here comes another pitch for a new paradigm. Feels like I've heard that phrase a hundred times in the past two years. --- It's still the game theory approach at the core. People only take it seriously when interests are involved. Nothing new there. --- Let me ask in return: real signals have been sedimented, and then what? Who will execute? --- Prediction markets = democratized market research. Actually, it sounds pretty good. --- Forget it, information gaps will always exist. This thing is just a different skin on the same concept. --- Interesting, but still far from replacing the media.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatchervip
· 2025-12-19 23:12
It sounds good, but the ones who can truly make money are always those with the most up-to-date information...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobiavip
· 2025-12-19 04:25
That's right, economic incentives are the real truth machine... Polling methods are indeed too superficial.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleMaidvip
· 2025-12-19 04:25
Wake up, polling data has long been manipulated, and the prediction market's genuine mechanism is truly reliable.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDayvip
· 2025-12-19 04:14
Sounds good, but the reality is that the big players have already laid out their chips, and retail investors are just the bagholders.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainWorkervip
· 2025-12-19 04:12
Basically, it's using money to force people to tell the truth, which is much more reliable than those fake polls.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMinionvip
· 2025-12-19 04:07
This thing sounds good, but the real question is who gets to define "truth". Big stakeholders with vested interests can manipulate prices just like that, it's just a different form of brainwashing. The economic incentives theory sounds perfect, but in practice, isn't it still about information gaps and the amount of capital? Prediction markets are popular, but don't hype them up as the truth machine; at the end of the day, it's still a game of human nature. This logical flaw is quite significant; public opinion polls can be manipulated, and prediction market prices can also be driven down or up through dumping or pumping. Talking about replacing traditional media, it feels more like a change of form without changing substance, just moving the battleground of public opinion from editorial offices to exchanges.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9f682d4cvip
· 2025-12-19 04:07
It sounds nice, but the ones who really make money are probably those with the biggest information gaps.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)