They know the name but keep it under wraps. How's that supposed to make sense? Either this whole investigation is a total mess, or somebody's being deliberately deceptive about it. Could be both, honestly. The lack of transparency here is raising real questions about what's actually going on.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 2025-12-22 03:34
Really, knowing the name but not saying it? This operation is amazing, feels like there's something fishy going on.
---
It's the same old schtick of "transparency", the information gap is tight.
---
Both? Then it's just going to end in a mess, a typical case of fighting on both sides.
---
This transparency... I really can't hold it together anymore, haha.
---
Choosing between a messy investigation or concealment, neither sounds good.
---
When can we get rid of this riddle-like routine?
---
Lacking transparency is put too softly, this is just playing tricks.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurker
· 2025-12-19 22:04
Uh, this transparency is really disappointing. It feels like someone is hiding something.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ccc36bc5
· 2025-12-19 05:55
This transparency... is really outrageous. Don't you want to reveal the name? I'm tired of this Web3 routine.
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larry
· 2025-12-19 05:54
Uh, isn't this a classic case of hiding everything? Zero transparency.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMaker
· 2025-12-19 05:51
Hmm... this doesn't feel right. Do you still hide it? Typical of wanting it both ways.
What about transparency? That's just outrageous.
Shrugging both shoulders, either a botched job or there's something fishy.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 2025-12-19 05:48
This transparency, haha, is this how Web3 is? Same old tricks. You know the name but won't say it? There must be some shady dealings involved.
They know the name but keep it under wraps. How's that supposed to make sense? Either this whole investigation is a total mess, or somebody's being deliberately deceptive about it. Could be both, honestly. The lack of transparency here is raising real questions about what's actually going on.