#美国就业数据表现强劲超出预期 How big is the gap between Bitcoin's dream and reality? 🔴
At the beginning of the year, major institutions like BlackRock, Fidelity, and Standard Chartered all made loud claims, such as "target sprint to 150,000" and "forecast 250,000." The reasons sounded quite convincing—halving supply tightness, billions of dollars flowing into ETFs, potential supportive policies from new governments... But what’s the result? Looking back now, this operation can be called a textbook-level harvest! 💢
Numbers speak for themselves. On October 12, Bitcoin hit a high of 126,000, and the story afterward has been quite heavy—a 33% crash, especially in November, with a single-month drop of 28%. This is no longer a technical adjustment but a real downward restructuring! $BTC $ETH $BNB None of these market movements were spared.
What about the once-booming bullish logic?
**Supply-side failure**: Halving indeed shrinks supply, but without genuine buying support, scarcity becomes a false proposition.
**Institutional entry becomes a joke**: The ETF quota is there, but has big money really entered? More often, it’s retail investors cutting each other, and main funds just stay on the sidelines.
**Macroeconomic environment reversal**: Inflation data isn’t as friendly as expected, and central banks’ attitudes have shifted from easing to cautiousness, directly draining liquidity. $BTC finding it hard to hold 80,000, let alone targets like 150,000, which have long been thrown out of the market’s sight. 🚨
This is the truth of the crypto world—grand narratives at the beginning of the year turn into a harvest time for retail investors by year's end. 2025 isn’t a continuation of the bull market but a carefully crafted game by institutions. Wake up.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractPhobia
· 2025-12-21 17:30
The wave of motivational speeches at the beginning of the year was indeed comfortable, but now it tastes bitter. That's how institutions are; they talk beautifully and cut loss beautifully as well.
---
A dream of 150,000 is quite extravagant; now even protecting 80,000 depends on hanging by a thread.
---
The narrative of tightening supply due to the halving is really something; anyone would believe it. And the result? Just this?
---
Retail investors cut each other while market makers remain still; this is the eternal truth of the crypto world. The operation manual of institutions is written at a textbook level.
---
Inflation hasn't improved, and liquidity being pulled again makes the number 150,000 seem like a fairy tale. It's laughable.
---
The ETF quota is visible to everyone, but has real money entered the market? Asking this is like asking whether the emperor is wearing clothes.
---
The grand narrative at the beginning of the year and the big cut loss at the end of the year. There are only a few scripts in the crypto world, and every year they are performed again, yet people still buy it.
---
A 33% big dump is no longer called an adjustment; this is redefining your account numbers.
---
Wake up; the game rules for 2025 have already been set, we just don't know what role we are playing.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTs
· 2025-12-19 07:38
BlackRock, Fidelity, these guys are really incredible. The numbers they hyped at the beginning of the year now look like illusions. I almost believed it.
---
A 28% single-month decline, and you call that an adjustment? Just smashing through psychological defenses, fine.
---
Tight supply, ETFs, halving... sounds very convincing, but what happened? No buying interest came, and the story was all made up.
---
The main funds must be hiding now. Retail investors are just cutting each other’s losses. That’s what they call institutional entry.
---
150,000, 250,000... now even 80,000 is uncertain. Luckily, I didn’t go all in on this crap.
---
When inflation reverses, the central bank’s attitude changes. Liquidity is pulled at will. Nothing matters in the face of macroeconomics.
---
This narrative is the same every year in the crypto world. At the beginning of the year, they paint a big picture, and by the end, the bagholders appear. I see through it.
---
2025 has really become an institution’s harvesting game. Honestly, I’m a bit tired of all the popcorn watching.
---
Without real cash buy orders, all the scarcity is just an excuse to cut the leeks.
---
Get real, really. Don’t be fooled by grand narratives anymore. This is a zero-sum game.
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdropper
· 2025-12-19 07:37
Still telling stories? BlackRock and those guys are like that— the more they hype, the harder they fall.
I knew 150,000 was a scam. Is it still not too late to regret now?
To put it simply, the institutions never really entered the market; it's just retail investors cutting each other, and the main players have already run away.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 2025-12-19 07:24
It's the same old story. The promises made at the beginning of the year have now vanished into thin air. Truly unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 2025-12-19 07:14
nah hold up... "supply shock" without actual bid support? that's just cope with extra steps. seen this exact playbook in 2021 - tokenomics look tight on paper til they don't lol
#美国就业数据表现强劲超出预期 How big is the gap between Bitcoin's dream and reality? 🔴
At the beginning of the year, major institutions like BlackRock, Fidelity, and Standard Chartered all made loud claims, such as "target sprint to 150,000" and "forecast 250,000." The reasons sounded quite convincing—halving supply tightness, billions of dollars flowing into ETFs, potential supportive policies from new governments... But what’s the result? Looking back now, this operation can be called a textbook-level harvest! 💢
Numbers speak for themselves. On October 12, Bitcoin hit a high of 126,000, and the story afterward has been quite heavy—a 33% crash, especially in November, with a single-month drop of 28%. This is no longer a technical adjustment but a real downward restructuring! $BTC $ETH $BNB None of these market movements were spared.
What about the once-booming bullish logic?
**Supply-side failure**: Halving indeed shrinks supply, but without genuine buying support, scarcity becomes a false proposition.
**Institutional entry becomes a joke**: The ETF quota is there, but has big money really entered? More often, it’s retail investors cutting each other, and main funds just stay on the sidelines.
**Macroeconomic environment reversal**: Inflation data isn’t as friendly as expected, and central banks’ attitudes have shifted from easing to cautiousness, directly draining liquidity. $BTC finding it hard to hold 80,000, let alone targets like 150,000, which have long been thrown out of the market’s sight. 🚨
This is the truth of the crypto world—grand narratives at the beginning of the year turn into a harvest time for retail investors by year's end. 2025 isn’t a continuation of the bull market but a carefully crafted game by institutions. Wake up.