A major crypto exchange has filed lawsuits against Michigan, Illinois, and Connecticut, challenging how these states oversee prediction markets. The dispute centers on regulatory authority and the framework governing prediction market platforms. This legal action highlights ongoing tensions between the crypto industry and state-level regulators regarding the proper oversight mechanisms for emerging trading products and market infrastructure.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Hash_Banditvip
· 2025-12-22 00:07
ngl this is gonna be messy... states keep swinging hammers at prediction markets when they don't even understand the network topology. seen this cycle before tbh
Reply0
GasFeeGazervip
· 2025-12-21 09:36
The lawsuits have started again; these states really don't understand what innovation means.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMastervip
· 2025-12-19 09:56
Finally, someone dares to confront these states. It was long overdue to fight back.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 2025-12-19 09:55
Here we go again, the old routine of state-level regulation vs. exchanges. Based on data performance, the success rate of such lawsuits isn't actually very high; the historical records are right there.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnetvip
· 2025-12-19 09:27
Here we go again, the state government wants to block the way. Should have known it would turn out like this --- Prediction markets are indeed a gray area, and exchanges are forced to confront it helplessly --- Damn, three states teaming up? This is getting complicated --- Regulatory authority is always a tangled issue. Who actually has the final say? --- The federal government should step in and regulate. If local governments keep messing around, who will dare to do business? --- Prediction markets are fundamentally fine; it's just these politicians looking for trouble --- It's the same old approach—ban first, regulate later. Really annoying --- Can lawsuits win? I doubt it. US law has never been friendly to exchanges --- Feels like exchanges are just wasting lawyers' fees; they can't really change anything --- Does Michigan want to monopolize? That's just too outrageous
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)