2025-12-19 12:24:42

Building Systems That Reward Long-Term Holders Over Quick Exits

AlignerZ is reimagining how projects can protect investor interests and create sustainable value accumulation. Instead of allowing whale dumps and instant liquidations to dominate the market, the platform introduces a structured bidding framework with strict safeguards.

The approach centers on two key mechanisms: IWO and TVS. By integrating these tools, AlignerZ ensures that holders maintain meaningful economic power while the system discourages destructive short-term speculation. It's about shifting the incentive structure—making patience and commitment more profitable than panic selling.

This framework tackles a real pain point in the current market: the imbalance between institutional actors and retail participants who genuinely believe in long-term value creation.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCrier

· 2025-12-22 04:40

The whale dumping is indeed annoying. I’m optimistic about this idea; finally, there's a project that seriously addresses the institutions playing people for suckers. If it can really be executed, that would be great; let's hope it's not just empty talk. The combination of IWO and TVS is quite interesting; we need to see how it specifically lands. Another "holder-friendly" plan, hoping this time it’s not about playing the retail investors for suckers after the fact. This logic makes sense, but how to prevent this mechanism from being exploited? Someone should have done this a long time ago; short-term speculation has made a mess of the entire market.

View OriginalReply0

digital_archaeologist

· 2025-12-19 12:56

Basically, it's just about trapping retail investors, it sounds like a new way to cut leeks Wait, can IWO and TVS really prevent whales from selling off? I don't believe it Is this mechanism reliable? Is there an audit report? It's the usual rhetoric of long-termism and sustainable value; be cautious Have you thought about how to run away yet?

View OriginalReply0

BakedCatFanboy

· 2025-12-19 12:53

No matter how many whales there are, don't think about crashing the market. I like this logic. Long-term holders can finally hold their heads high... but I'm still a bit unclear on how exactly IWO and TVS work. It's both anti-whale and anti-speculation. Does AlignerZ really want to please everyone at the same time? Is this mechanism reliable... can it really stop institutional dumping? I don't buy it. Finally, someone wants to stand up for retail investors. Let's see how long they can stick to it. The zero-sum game between institutions and retail investors... feels more like mysticism. Many projects have said that changing the incentive structure would help, but then... nothing happened. It's somewhat meaningful, much more than those projects that just cut the leeks. Another anti-speculation framework is coming, betting that this time it won't just be a show. Having meaningful economic influence as a holder... sounds good, but in practice, it's all a trap.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerPrivateKey

· 2025-12-19 12:51

This set of logic sounds good, but the real question is—will whales really be restricted? Or is it just another promising promise that sounds good Long-term holders have been making money all along, but when institutions enter, they've already made enough, and we still have to hustle Have you heard of IWO and TVS? Can these two really change the game? It feels like every project claims so Promised to protect retail investors, but isn't it just about who holds more chips? It's laughable Interesting, but I wonder if it will just become another excuse to cut leeks when actually implemented Hmm, the anti-incentive mechanism sounds promising, at least more sincere than most project promises If it could truly restrain whales from selling off, the market would have already died out, don't be too optimistic Wait, is this implying that previous projects were just enabling whales to cut leeks?

View OriginalReply0