Short video platforms strictly regulate virtual asset content, new developments in blockchain industry standards

OnChainDetective · 2025-12-19T12:56:09+00:00

【ChainWen】Big platforms are starting to get serious. Recently, a certain short video platform released a financial content community guideline, imposing many restrictions on the blockchain and digital asset fields—any content claiming to be about virtual currency exchange, trading intermediaries, or pricing services is banned. It sounds regulated, but the underlying logic is clear: to crack down on speculation of virtual assets, illegal stock recommendations, money laundering, and illegal fundraising. The guideline is already strict during the trial phase, and it will only become more regulated in the future. For those involved in creating blockchain-related content, it's necessary to adjust strategies in advance—compliance first, and fancy packaging won't work.

OnChainDetective

2025-12-19 12:56:09

【链文】大平台开始动真格了。近期某短视频平台发布了财经内容社区公约，针对区块链、数字资产领域做了不少限制——凡是打着虚拟货币兑换、交易中介、定价服务的幌子发布内容，统统被禁。听起来规范，但背后的逻辑很清楚：打击炒作虚拟资产、非法荐股、洗钱和非法集资这些灰色业务。这套公约试行阶段就已经这么严了，后续只会越来越规范。对于从事区块链相关内容创作的人来说，得提前调整策略——合规第一，花式包装也没用。

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

quiet_lurker

· 2025-12-22 03:04

It's been apparent for a long time that the platform is getting stricter with content from the crypto world. Influencers need to wake up; it's really too late to turn back now. With this round of regulations, accounts that rely on misleading fans will face difficulties. Compliance is the long-term ticket to success, but who will actually do it?

View OriginalReply0

ForkLibertarian

· 2025-12-21 18:12

This is good, even the content has to be whitewashed. True innovators either change careers or remain silent. Wait, is what they call compliance really for the protection of retail investors? Or do they have other motives? It's been clear for a long time that big platforms will eventually clear the field; only the regular army can survive. Forget it, let's just focus on educational content; the era of making quick money is indeed over. With this wave of regulation, how will altcoin projects survive? This is actually favourable information for the leading exchanges. No more talking, change the account and start over; there are always ways. In fact, their urgency shows that the Chain Community is really on fire; otherwise, who would pay attention to you?

View OriginalReply0

RetiredMiner

· 2025-12-21 06:56

It should have been managed earlier; there have been too many scammers in the crypto world on short videos over the past two years. --- Compliance is easy to say but hard to do... --- Packaging? Packaging doesn't work for anything now; we can only honestly talk about technology. --- Content creators need to wake up; the trend is about to change. --- While it is strict, the real project party doesn't rely on short videos to play people for suckers. --- Fancy packaging really needs to stop, but how to create content under compliance is the real test. --- Now it's good; those streamers who shout "buy the dip" every day will have to change careers. --- The regulations have come; we just have to adapt... but this might not be a bad thing for the industry. --- The short video model for promoting coins was bound to die; I've been tired of it for a long time. --- The saying "Compliance first" is correct; all those flashy things before really should be banned.

View OriginalReply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 2025-12-19 13:26

It’s about time to regulate this. Those bloggers who hype coins every day need to change their ways. --- Compliance is unavoidable. Instead of resisting, it’s better to adapt early. --- Fancy packaging really doesn’t help, but projects that focus on real work have more opportunities. --- Haha, now those who manipulate and scam will have to hold back for a while. --- Speaking of which, strict regulation is good, and the issue of bad money driving out good money must be addressed. --- Done. I need to revise my entire content library... --- Actually, this is good for genuine builders. Fewer scammers mean a cleaner environment. --- I just worry that the regulations will become more and more restrictive, making normal discussions impossible.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryBaby

· 2025-12-19 13:06

Haha, finally it's the scammers' turn to buy the dip --- Here we go again, every time they talk about regulation, but it still burns like wildfires --- Creators should wake up, no matter how fancy the packaging, it can't beat a report --- Now it's better, we need to produce real results, not just shouting signals --- Compliance? How am I supposed to make a living then? Can analyzing on-chain data support me? --- Honestly, the platform should have done this a long time ago, there are too many white-label financial scammers --- If the trial is this strict... aren't they going to ban everything later? --- No worries, just move to TG and Discord to continue --- I've been tired of those "Crypto Gods" bragging on short videos for a long time

View OriginalReply0

ProveMyZK

· 2025-12-19 12:59

I'm tired of those schemes that pretend to be "Crypto Influencers" and manipulate retail investors. This time, they finally took action. Projects that are genuinely doing things don't fear investigations; it's those who rely on hype to make a living that should be worried. Compliance should have been implemented a long time ago. The short video platform has directly banned it, so we need to think of other ways out. Now, let's see who still dares to openly call signals. Money laundering and illegal fundraising should be addressed, but we also need to leave a way out for legitimate projects. Speaking of which, those without real substance should have been eliminated long ago. With such strict regulations, we must quickly revise our content.

View OriginalReply0