Have you heard this saying—competition is for losers? This is Peter Thiel's most thought-provoking point in "Zero to One."
The core logic is actually quite sobering: most project teams are fighting each other in the red ocean, splitting profits into tiny pieces, which is a zero-sum game from 1 to N. But the truly profitable approach is exactly the opposite—relying on technological innovation to find opportunities overlooked by everyone, then establishing an advantage through creative monopolies. This is the essence of going from 0 to 1.
How to do it? The methodology outlined in the book is surprisingly simple: first, dominate a small, insignificant market and become the undisputed leader in that field, then gradually expand outward from this fortress. It may sound insignificant, but in any highly competitive track, this strategy is like a cheat card.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoPunster
· 2025-12-22 04:25
It sounds nice, but the reality is that most people are getting increasingly trapped in the 1 to N cycle, with no chance to find any blue ocean.
I've heard the 0 to 1 story a thousand times, but how many have actually made it? They've all become excuses for Be Played for Suckers in the crypto world.
This theory is just a joke in a Bear Market; it's better to focus on surviving first, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuy
· 2025-12-19 16:58
That's true, but how many can actually do it in reality? Most are still floundering in the red ocean.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioning
· 2025-12-19 16:58
It sounds good, but in reality, how many projects can really find those overlooked opportunities? They're all armchair strategists after the fact.
Monopoly sounds great, but isn't the threshold just capital? How can small investors play?
From 0 to 1, I've heard it so many times my ears are sore. The key is still having a team, resources, and luck. Thiel's theories don't mean much to ordinary people like us.
NGL, this is just the game rules for the wealthy.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarm
· 2025-12-19 16:53
Sounds good, but on-chain data doesn't lie. For those projects claiming to find the "blue ocean," I've looked into at least 50 of them, and the capital concentration is over 70%. The so-called creative monopoly is actually a capital pool monopoly. It's about time to report them to the police.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 2025-12-19 16:47
It sounds good, but in reality, most people can't even dominate small markets, let alone create monopolies through innovation.
Have you heard this saying—competition is for losers? This is Peter Thiel's most thought-provoking point in "Zero to One."
The core logic is actually quite sobering: most project teams are fighting each other in the red ocean, splitting profits into tiny pieces, which is a zero-sum game from 1 to N. But the truly profitable approach is exactly the opposite—relying on technological innovation to find opportunities overlooked by everyone, then establishing an advantage through creative monopolies. This is the essence of going from 0 to 1.
How to do it? The methodology outlined in the book is surprisingly simple: first, dominate a small, insignificant market and become the undisputed leader in that field, then gradually expand outward from this fortress. It may sound insignificant, but in any highly competitive track, this strategy is like a cheat card.