Ever notice how some projects launch tokens post-TGE yet can't figure out what to do with them? The irony hits different when the only thing holders can actually do is dump. No staking. No governance. No real utility. Just a sell button wrapped in promises. This is exactly the kind of lazy tokenomics that kills momentum and destroys community trust. If you're launching a token, at least pretend to have a plan beyond 'let people exit.'

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StableCoinKarenvip
· 2025-12-21 03:47
Damn, it's this kind of garbage tokenomics again... it's really ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fightervip
· 2025-12-21 01:01
This is what annoys me the most—the air coin scam, promising a lot but actually nothing.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithAPlanvip
· 2025-12-19 17:01
Damn, this is why I don't touch new coins anymore.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 2025-12-19 16:47
According to the white paper, the token economics design of these projects would have failed in section 3.2. Tokens without incentive mechanisms cannot establish a stable game equilibrium.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHerovip
· 2025-12-19 16:43
It has proven that most projects' tokenomics design is a joke, and the protocol architecture is merely a facade.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLickervip
· 2025-12-19 16:32
It's the same garbage coin economics again, basically a variant of scamming people out of money and running away.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)