2025-12-19 19:23:47

Retail investors always focus on price fluctuations first, putting explanations aside for later. 📖

By 2025, those AI proxy frameworks that haven't run away have become the most credible endorsement in the crypto market.

This phenomenon is very interesting. Most participants actually don't read whitepapers or official websites; their decision-making logic is very simple—they look at real market performance. An AI proxy framework that has lasted until now already indicates a problem. Those projects that started strong and then fizzled out have long since sunk, while the ones that survive have earned credibility through the test of time.

This completely reverses the traditional project evaluation logic. Trust is not determined by documentation, but by survival itself, which is the strongest signal of trust.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PseudoIntellectual

· 2025-12-22 17:19

Surviving to this day is the best endorsement, and this is certainly true. A bunch of AI projects were making a lot of noise before, but now they are nowhere to be found. Survival means trust, tough. This is the real law of the market, don’t be fooled by sweet talk. To be honest, the White Paper is just a waste of time; it's better to look at the Order Book for honesty. Projects that have survived indeed have something to show for it; they are still standing after so many storms. Time is the best filter; those who were just fishing in troubled waters have long since perished. Interestingly, those who don't read the White Paper seem to be living better; it's ironic. Being alive represents everything; everything else is nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 2025-12-21 05:36

Haha, those who survive are the winners, I love this logic. --- White Papers and the like are all virtual, looking at the Order Book is real and reliable. --- What you said makes sense, survivor bias is also a signal. --- So now it’s just about who survives the longest, kind of like natural selection. --- That’s why I only play with good Liquidity, the others are all traps. --- Time tests everything, projects that are still alive in 2025 should indeed be trusted. --- I don't read White Papers, I just look at K-line charts and volume. --- Anyway, it’s all just guessing, might as well follow the hype. --- Surviving ≠ having prospects, but at least it’s not an obviously garbage project. --- This logic is a bit twisted, surviving only means not having a Rug Pull, it doesn’t mean making money.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketHustler

· 2025-12-19 19:54

Haha, surviving is a good project. I believe in this logic. --- Honestly, whitepapers are just decorations; not losing money is the real hard truth. --- So now it all depends on who is still alive, those who are dead are all scammers. --- Under this theory, those who keep issuing announcements every day are actually the most suspicious. --- Being alive = having prospects. Simple and straightforward, I like it. --- But being alive might also just mean clinging to life... --- Projects that were lively and bouncing last year might be gone this year; survival is unreliable. --- In the end, it's still a gamble on who can last the longest. It's all equally exciting.

View OriginalReply0

RektButStillHere

· 2025-12-19 19:43

Haha, living is winning—that's the logic I bought into. Profitable projects don't really require you to read the white paper; just rise in value and that's it. Survival equals trust. So what about those that died earlier? Those who survive aren't necessarily reliable; they've just lasted long enough.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPrince

· 2025-12-19 19:39

Isn't this just survival of the fittest? Being alive is the best proof itself. No matter how fancy the white paper is, it’s useless.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter9000

· 2025-12-19 19:35

It's not some white paper that determines victory or defeat; simply being alive is the answer itself. --- To put it simply, projects that survive come with their own halo, while others are just cannon fodder. --- This logic... Survival = Trust, so the longer they last, the more impressive they are. --- I just want to know if the frameworks that are alive now will still be alive a year later. It all feels like gambling. --- Alright, I only look at the price increase. White papers can go jump off a cliff. --- Survival of the fittest, that's it. Don't overcomplicate it.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 2025-12-19 19:35

Haha, really, I'm the kind of person who doesn't read whitepapers. I buy when it rises and sell when it falls, that's it. Projects that survive are truly more trustworthy; no matter how loudly they are hyped, the market will just crush them. Survivors in 2025 are the real winners; time kills all the scammers. This is the truth of crypto—more promises are nothing compared to a simple price chart. Survival itself is the best endorsement; there's not much more to say.

View OriginalReply0