2025-12-19 20:29:38

A technical article that took quite some time to refine, looking back, the quality is indeed quite good—covering the common pitfalls and solutions when starting from scratch with Vibe Coding for large projects.

Honestly, these in-depth long articles have never truly "gone viral" in the community. The Meme series posts are the same, with popularity far below expectations. But there's no real regret.

It's been over ten days, and developers continue to cite, discuss, and interact. This alone shows everything—people recognize the quality of the content, and find it useful. For creators, this kind of community recognition is far more meaningful than a temporary viral hit.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FloorPriceNightmare

· 2025-12-22 19:01

This is what really gets things done; those who don't follow trends and chase popularity ultimately win.

View OriginalReply0

RuntimeError

· 2025-12-22 14:21

Depth good articles are like this; those who truly understand will naturally come back.

View OriginalReply0

ForumLurker

· 2025-12-22 10:02

Depth content is just like this; those who truly understand it are quietly collecting it, which is much stronger than the trashy hype that floods the screen.

View OriginalReply0

blockBoy

· 2025-12-19 20:59

This is the true value, not a numbers game --- Deep articles are like this; those who find them useful will revisit repeatedly --- Genuine content will never "go viral," but there will always be people using it --- I really respect this mindset; it's much more reliable than those riding the trend --- More than ten days later, people are still citing it, which shows the content is truly solid --- Whether it blows up or not doesn't matter; helping developers is enough --- This kind of rooted recognition is indeed more meaningful than superficial traffic --- Wait, have you stepped on all the Vibe Coding slots? --- Good quality speaks for itself; no need to rely on algorithms --- It may seem like it’s not popular, but it has already become a standard reference in the community --- I’m most annoyed by those deep articles that are just made up for traffic; yours is truly genuine --- If someone uses it, it’s meaningful; this logic is flawless

View OriginalReply0

SillyWhale

· 2025-12-19 20:55

This is the right way. Compared to chasing popularity, it's really impressive that developers are actually using your solutions to solve problems. Vibe Coding can easily lead to pitfalls, but your well-established work is valuable. If in-depth articles don't go viral? That's right, viral hits are all superficial; recognition rooted in the community is what truly matters. By the way, people have been exchanging ideas over the past ten days, which shows that it really helps people. As long as the quality is good, there's no need to chase after hype. Long articles do have disadvantages, but the stuff you persist with will be remembered by developers. Some cite it, some use it—this is much more interesting than just flooding the feed.

View OriginalReply0

SelfRugger

· 2025-12-19 20:53

Damn, this is true creation, a hundred times better than those trashy articles riding the trend --- In-depth articles are like this; only truly clever developers can see their value --- Wait, does Vibe Coding really solve so many pitfalls? I'm a bit tempted to try it --- Recognition from the community rooted in the community is indeed more valuable than ten thousand likes, I agree with that --- As long as the quality is good, it doesn't matter if it blows up or not; as long as people keep using it, that's profit --- The most torturous part of such long articles is the gap between output and popularity, but your attitude really impresses me --- Really, that temporary hype is just a bubble; continuous references from developers are the real indicator --- A complete roadmap from zero to large-scale projects is indeed rare --- Not to boast or criticize, this kind of community recognition that accompanies is more valuable than spamming --- Thinking of those popular articles before, no one mentions them now; yours has lasted even longer

View OriginalReply0

ChainWanderingPoet

· 2025-12-19 20:46

This is the real valuable stuff, with the number of citations far more meaningful than the number of shares. Deep content is like this; whether it becomes popular depends on luck, but those who use it know the quality. The victory of pragmatists, memes will eventually fade, but useful information will always be sought after.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBard

· 2025-12-19 20:43

In-depth articles are like this: they don't chase popularity but have vitality. Being referenced after more than ten days clearly indicates that they hit the pain points. --- Compared to those superficial articles that only get attention for a week, this kind of content that helps solve real problems is truly impressive. --- Brother, I need to learn from your attitude. As long as the content quality is solid, that's enough; there's no need to ride the wave of trending topics. --- It's very valuable to have ongoing developer exchanges; it shows it's not just self-indulgence. --- Vibe Coding's detailed summary of pitfalls is rare; saved it. --- Hitting a viral article feels good temporarily, but being referenced by others is a long-term asset. This logic is spot on.

View OriginalReply0