Interesting phenomenon worth noting: In the 2025 liquidity ranking, $IBIT is the only ETF product with a negative annual return, yet it still ranks 6th. This contrast precisely illustrates the core issue — traditional investors are conducting a long-term holding experiment. On the surface, negative returns may attract criticism, but the real point of interest is that even in the face of losses, the fund inflow into this product still exceeds that of traditional safe-haven assets like $GLD. This reflects the firm confidence of institutional investors in Bitcoin's long-term value and their strategy of maintaining positions amid market volatility. Data doesn't lie, and the ranking itself is the best explanation.

BTC-1,25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MeaninglessApevip
· 2025-12-19 21:52
Still ranked 6th despite losses? That's outrageous. The institutions really have strong faith.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivorvip
· 2025-12-19 21:49
Losing ranked 6th and still able to suck blood—that's true confidence voting.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeafvip
· 2025-12-19 21:49
Negative returns still rank 6th? That's outrageous, indicating that big investors are really bottom-fishing and stockpiling.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorervip
· 2025-12-19 21:48
Losses can still attract so much money in, which shows that big institutions are not worried at all.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 2025-12-19 21:43
Unbelievable, even with losses, they can still attract funds. This is the true scale of institutions.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)