Interesting phenomenon worth noting: In the 2025 liquidity ranking, $IBIT is the only ETF product with a negative annual return, yet it still ranks 6th. This contrast precisely illustrates the core issue — traditional investors are conducting a long-term holding experiment. On the surface, negative returns may attract criticism, but the real point of interest is that even in the face of losses, the fund inflow into this product still exceeds that of traditional safe-haven assets like $GLD. This reflects the firm confidence of institutional investors in Bitcoin's long-term value and their strategy of maintaining positions amid market volatility. Data doesn't lie, and the ranking itself is the best explanation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MeaninglessApe
· 2025-12-19 21:52
Still ranked 6th despite losses? That's outrageous. The institutions really have strong faith.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivor
· 2025-12-19 21:49
Losing ranked 6th and still able to suck blood—that's true confidence voting.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeaf
· 2025-12-19 21:49
Negative returns still rank 6th? That's outrageous, indicating that big investors are really bottom-fishing and stockpiling.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorer
· 2025-12-19 21:48
Losses can still attract so much money in, which shows that big institutions are not worried at all.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 2025-12-19 21:43
Unbelievable, even with losses, they can still attract funds. This is the true scale of institutions.
Interesting phenomenon worth noting: In the 2025 liquidity ranking, $IBIT is the only ETF product with a negative annual return, yet it still ranks 6th. This contrast precisely illustrates the core issue — traditional investors are conducting a long-term holding experiment. On the surface, negative returns may attract criticism, but the real point of interest is that even in the face of losses, the fund inflow into this product still exceeds that of traditional safe-haven assets like $GLD. This reflects the firm confidence of institutional investors in Bitcoin's long-term value and their strategy of maintaining positions amid market volatility. Data doesn't lie, and the ranking itself is the best explanation.