When you're building something from scratch, the reality is often brutal. In the early days, there's no infrastructure to point to—no team in place, no prototype sitting in a garage, nothing tangible you can show investors or partners. You're literally starting from absolute zero. That's the gap between the narrative people construct later and what was actually happening on day one. The difference between "we had a vision" and "we had absolutely nothing" is exactly where most ventures collapse. Those founding moments are where you discover if you're solving a real problem or just chasing an idea.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
not_your_keys
· 2025-12-22 18:28
Ngl, the cruelest part of going from zero to one is having to deceive yourself into believing you have a vision, when in fact you have nothing.
View OriginalReply0
SurvivorshipBias
· 2025-12-22 08:04
The moment of starting from scratch is the most real, bragging about being amazing comes later.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 2025-12-22 03:09
According to the data, over 90% of startup projects fail within the first 6 months of funding due to the inability to prove product-market fit, and this article discusses this harsh reality.
View OriginalReply0
ContractHunter
· 2025-12-19 22:57
Starting from zero is really tough; most projects die here.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9ad11037
· 2025-12-19 22:56
In simple terms, it's the illusion and reality of entrepreneurship; behind the glamorous stories, there are tears and blood.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 2025-12-19 22:53
Starting from zero during that period was really hellish; to be honest, I had nothing at all.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaximalist
· 2025-12-19 22:49
ngl this is where the actual selection pressure happens. most projects fail because they're solving for narrative, not network effects. the ones that survive? they're obsessed with the *problem*, not the pitch deck.
When you're building something from scratch, the reality is often brutal. In the early days, there's no infrastructure to point to—no team in place, no prototype sitting in a garage, nothing tangible you can show investors or partners. You're literally starting from absolute zero. That's the gap between the narrative people construct later and what was actually happening on day one. The difference between "we had a vision" and "we had absolutely nothing" is exactly where most ventures collapse. Those founding moments are where you discover if you're solving a real problem or just chasing an idea.