2025-12-19 23:28:50

In web3, most projects grab eyeballs once, then fade just as fast.

Real differentiation? It's not about the initial splash. It's about creating participation loops that stick around and compound.

When you design systems where users come back naturally—where engagement becomes routine rather than forced—that's when you build something with staying power. That quiet edge is what separates one-hit wonders from ecosystems that actually grow.

Take protocol design as an example. The ones winning aren't just pushing features; they're architecting participation itself. Reward mechanisms, governance paths, community contribution frameworks—these aren't side details. They're the difference between a product people use once and one they return to month after month.

Genome Protocol is one of the teams thinking about this layer. Building systems where the more you participate, the more the network compounds value for you. That's the game.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FOMOrektGuy

· 2025-12-22 06:34

You're not wrong, but the reality is that most people just want to double their money quickly; who the hell really cares about compound interest...

View OriginalReply0

DYORMaster

· 2025-12-19 23:56

That's so true. Right now, this circle is just a bunch of flash-in-the-pan projects, and very few can truly stay. I agree with the concept of the compounding effect, but honestly, most projects simply can't design such a thing. Making participation the norm rather than mandatory? That sounds easy, but actually doing it is really difficult...

View OriginalReply0

BrokenYield

· 2025-12-19 23:44

nah, most projects just have terrible tokenomics wrapped in buzzwords... retention cycles mean nothing if your leverage ratio collapses in the next bear market

Reply0

GateUser-7b078580

· 2025-12-19 23:41

Data shows that most projects fail by the third month. Although retention rate sounds good in theory, no matter how sophisticated the mechanism design is, it can't withstand high gas fees. Let's wait and see the specific data from Genome Protocol; hitting a historic low is the true test.

View OriginalReply0

ILCollector

· 2025-12-19 23:35

At the end of the day, it still comes down to retention. Once one-time users have had their fun, there's nothing left. The more you participate, the more value you get—this logic sounds good, but the key is whether it can really be achieved. Everyone talks about compound interest, but few can actually design it effectively. How does Genome ensure that its incentive mechanism won't be exploited for quick gains? Watching project teams boast about how clever their designs are every day, but in the end, it just turns into a zero-sum game. Saying it’s a continuous cycle sounds nice, but maybe it’s just another way to cut the leeks. The "ecosystem" of Web3 projects is often just good storytelling. Have you ever seen a protocol that can truly maintain user stickiness for more than half a year? I haven't come across one yet.

View OriginalReply0