When examining the investment logic in the technology chip sector, our view is: these two giants are not a binary choice, but rather a complementary and win-win situation. Why? Because true competitiveness is not only reflected in individual manufacturers but also in how the leadership position across the entire industry chain is propagated layer by layer. When industry-leading companies turn their advantages into market dominance, this effect will spread outward like ripples, and the exponential growth in demand is the catalyst for all of this. In the capital markets, such structural opportunities are often underestimated—those participants who can continuously benefit from industry upgrades will ultimately share in the growth dividends.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MidnightGenesis
· 2025-12-21 04:42
On-chain data shows that the logic of the industrial chain transmission does exist, but what I care more about is who is deploying contracts late at night to lock in this wave of dividends... From the code, the ones who really make money are never those who shout "complementary win-win", but rather the group of people who are lying in ambush in advance.
View OriginalReply0
SocialFiQueen
· 2025-12-20 00:55
Haha, complementary and win-win? Sounds great, but when it comes to spending money, you still have to choose a side.
View OriginalReply0
EternalMiner
· 2025-12-20 00:45
Bro, I feel like this logic is a bit idealistic... The industrial chain transmission effect sounds great, but when it comes to actual implementation, it really depends on who can choke the supply chain first.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightning
· 2025-12-20 00:42
Hey, I've heard the whole "industry chain transmission" explanation so many times, but it does make sense... The key is, how many actually manage to make money?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 2025-12-20 00:26
Hi there, the Ripple discussion is back again. This logic sounds good in theory, but what about in practice? The supply chain transmission effect does exist, but choosing one over the other is really just superficial. The core of capital games still depends on who can secure the largest share. Don't be fooled by the idea of "mutual complementarity and win-win."
When examining the investment logic in the technology chip sector, our view is: these two giants are not a binary choice, but rather a complementary and win-win situation. Why? Because true competitiveness is not only reflected in individual manufacturers but also in how the leadership position across the entire industry chain is propagated layer by layer. When industry-leading companies turn their advantages into market dominance, this effect will spread outward like ripples, and the exponential growth in demand is the catalyst for all of this. In the capital markets, such structural opportunities are often underestimated—those participants who can continuously benefit from industry upgrades will ultimately share in the growth dividends.