There is a classic view in economics: Nobel laureate Milton Friedman said that inflation is a monetary phenomenon, and some scholars are even more radical, claiming that all economic phenomena are monetary phenomena.



However, this theory has been repeatedly challenged over the years. Western central banks have maintained near-zero interest rates for over a decade, yet the effectiveness of monetary policy has diminished year after year, and economic growth remains sluggish. This has led many to reconsider: Is it really a monetary phenomenon?

So now a new perspective has emerged — all modern economic phenomena are fundamentally fiscal phenomena. Why? Because contemporary money is entirely backed by sovereign credit, supported by fiscal authority, and no longer a commodity.

Look at works like *The Deficit Myth*, Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), and last year’s *The Mother of Money and the Anchor of Risk* by Liu Shangxi, former director of the Chinese Academy of Fiscal Sciences. These works all emphasize the same core idea: the essence of modern money is credit, not commodities.

How did this shift happen? Looking back, in ancient China, shell money and knife money, in Europe the gold standard and silver standard, money was primarily a commodity, with its commodity nature at the forefront. Back then, money could be used practically, to make tools, and to store value.

With the advent of money shops and the establishment of modern banking, money gradually gained credit attributes, and this transformation took place. Today, paper money can still be burned for warmth, representing the last remnants of its commodity nature, but digital currencies stored in accounts? They have completely become pure credit tools.

What is the true and only function of digital currency? Paying taxes.

All sovereign currencies we hold, aside from their secondary uses like purchasing goods or storing value, fundamentally serve one purpose: paying taxes to the issuing government. This is the ultimate reason for their existence. Just like the example of Robinson Crusoe’s island — in places without a government, gold is merely a production tool, and paper money is just fuel; neither can truly be considered currency.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ContractCollectorvip
· 12h ago
If Friedman saw the current operations, he would probably crawl out of his coffin. Ten years of zero interest rates have failed to pump the economy; isn't this a slap in the face? The new term "fiscal phenomenon" has actually been hinted at for a long time, but only now do they dare to speak it out loud. The essence of currency is the government's credit endorsement; money without national tax support is worthless. Speaking of which, the conclusion that digital money is only for paying taxes is a bit terrifying upon further thought. To put it simply, we are using national credit for transactions, which is essentially a trust in the government's ability to collect taxes. In ancient times, shell money could still be used as tools, but the digits in modern electronic accounts can only be looked at; this transformation is indeed a bit ironic.
View OriginalReply0
GigaBrainAnonvip
· 12-20 01:35
To put it simply, current money is just a tax collection tool. Without government endorsement, nothing else matters—that's the real truth.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)