Anyone else feeling that the creator payout system on major social platforms is completely broken? The revenue share model just doesn't cut it for creators actually putting in the work. Feels like the platform keeps most of the pie while creators get scraps. This is exactly why Web3 alternatives with fairer tokenomics and direct creator-to-audience mechanisms are gaining traction. Time for a real shift in how creator value gets distributed.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeFi_Dad_Jokes
· 2025-12-22 12:05
What's the revenue sharing of the platform? Uh... it's already a joke, really. The tragic history of small creators.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiOrRekt
· 2025-12-20 05:54
The platform's take rate system has long been outdated. Web3 isn't a savior, but at least it gives creators leverage in negotiations, and that's the key.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivor
· 2025-12-20 05:39
ngl The profit-sharing model of traditional platforms is indeed outrageous. I've long stopped supporting it, and all the promises of being creator-friendly are just empty words.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggar
· 2025-12-20 05:33
Traditional platforms are just vampires, taking 90% while we get only 10%, it's really outrageous.
Anyone else feeling that the creator payout system on major social platforms is completely broken? The revenue share model just doesn't cut it for creators actually putting in the work. Feels like the platform keeps most of the pie while creators get scraps. This is exactly why Web3 alternatives with fairer tokenomics and direct creator-to-audience mechanisms are gaining traction. Time for a real shift in how creator value gets distributed.