Crypto Hedge Funds Hit Hard as ETF Growth Drains Trading Alpha

Source: CryptoTale Original Title: Crypto Hedge Funds Hit Hard as ETF Growth Drains Trading Alpha Original Link:

Crypto Hedge Funds Hit Hard as ETF Growth Drains Trading Alpha

• ETF inflows reduced crypto volatility and narrowed price gaps used by hedge funds
• Altcoin strategies collapsed as liquidity vanished during fast political-driven sell-offs.
• Market structure shifts forced funds to rethink trading models and risk exposure

Crypto hedge funds entered 2025 expecting a breakout after years on the margins of global finance. Instead, institutional ETF inflows reshaped markets, reduced volatility, and exposed limits in long-standing hedge fund strategies. Regulated Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange-traded funds redirected capital toward passive exposure. This shift compressed price inefficiencies that funds once relied on for trading profits.

Many managers expected regulatory clarity to unlock a new growth phase. Instead, professionals faced one of the harshest environments since the 2022 market crash.

ETF Flows Redraw Market Structure

ETF inflows concentrated liquidity in Bitcoin and Ethereum. As a result, price discovery became faster and spreads narrowed across major trading venues. Bitcoin punished strategies designed to profit from sharp price swings. Directional crypto funds ended November down 2.5%, marking their weakest year since losses exceeded 30% three years earlier.

Early Bitcoin rallies produced rapid moves but little usable liquidity. Prices surged and reversed quickly, limiting managers’ ability to enter or exit positions without slippage. The transition brought about a decrease in the division of trading between the exchanges. Trading volume was primarily contributed by institutional products and the latter eventually crowded out the traditional arbitrage strategies.

As the differentials between bid and ask prices narrowed, basic trades based on mispricing ceased to produce a consistent return. Volatility-dependent funds experienced a rise in drawdowns despite their active positioning.

Altcoin Strategies Breakdown

Losses extended beyond directional funds. Research-heavy portfolios focused on blockchain projects and altcoins fell about 23% after deep drawdowns during the year. Quant models tied to altcoins failed as liquidity vanished. The conditions were compared to the FTX and Terra Luna collapse in 2022.

According to market observers, the breakdown surprised many managers who expected a more mature market. Thin order books and sudden withdrawals by market makers intensified price declines.

Altcoin mean-reversion funds suffered the most. Many tokens dropped over 40% within hours, overwhelming short-term correction strategies.

Kacper Szafran, founder of M-Squared, said his firm shut down strategies reliant on shallow liquidity. M-Squared fell 3.5% in October, its worst month since November 2022.

Political Shocks and Forced Liquidations

Market stress peaked on Oct. 10 after policy announcements pledging tariffs on Chinese goods. Bitcoin fell 14% within hours, erasing nearly $20 billion in leveraged positions.

Thomas Chladek, managing director at Forteus, said the sell-off began while he traveled between Asia and Europe. He said positions collapsed mid-flight as liquidity dried up.

“Policy announcements may have triggered risk-off behavior,” Chladek said. “But mismanaged collateral caused cascading liquidations after market makers pulled out.” Yuval Reisman, founder of Atitlan Asset Management, described 2025 as driven by “policy-driven volatility.” He linked sudden market swings to policy headlines and political risk.

These shocks exacerbated the structural deficiencies that already existed. The funds were met with quick losses in shallow markets as the leverage was being pulled back. As the ETF flows’ core assets were stabilizing and melting the volatility away, the managers began looking for new ones.