ADA was unexpectedly included in the reserve list, and the founder stated that they were unaware of this.

2025-12-21 05:40:10

[Coin World] The Cardano project party has recently found itself in a bit of an awkward situation. The U.S. policy team directly included ADA in the planned “encryption strategic reserve” without any prior notice. The project founder expressed confusion, stating that he only learned about this matter through public channels.

To be honest, such policy support will definitely be a plus for the brand in the long run. However, the problem is that this creates an awkward situation: the technical development direction of the project itself and the external political topic guidance start to misalign. The project party wants to discuss technology, but public opinion is focused on policy expectations; this asynchrony may actually bring difficulties to subsequent communication.

From the market reaction, this news has hardly had any direct impact on the price of ADA. Anyway, it has fluctuated just like the overall market, without showing any unilateral trend.

ADA-3.98%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

YieldHunter

· 12h ago

honestly if you look at the data, ada's correlation with macro narratives is way too high rn. political tailwinds ≠ sustainable fundamentals, and that's exactly what we're seeing here—zero price action despite the noise. classic case of degens pricing in hope instead of actual protocol metrics

Reply0

SmartContractWorker

· 12h ago

Haha, this operation is really amazing, the policy wasn't communicated at all and they just put people on the list directly. ``` Government: I have given you support. Founder: What?? I found out from the news? It's a typical case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing; the project needs to focus on doing good work, but ends up being forced to take a side. ``` The price hasn't risen, which is a bit heartbreaking, indicating that the market actually doesn't buy this political story very much. ``` Now this is awkward; no matter how strong the technology is, it has to be discussed in political terms... ``` ``` Sometimes, political support can actually be a burden; the hype comes but the topic goes off track, and the communication costs explode. ``` ``` The problem is, this kind of passive inclusion, how awkward will it be when exiting later? ``` ``` I just want to see the technical progress of ADA, but I'm forced to listen to political jokes; isn't this a typical mismatch? ``` ``` Adding to the list without any notice... this decision-making process seems a bit hasty, but it seems to have no impact on the market anyway. ``` ``` The founder's feelings should be quite complicated; policy dividends are indeed dividends, but the way it's handled is a bit abrupt. ```

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotLaborer

· 12h ago

Haha, this matter is indeed a bit ridiculous, the officials are unaware and have been "included". The price hasn't moved, indicating that the market isn't buying it, we still need to see the technology implemented. What use is political backing? Without an application ecosystem, it’s all empty. Really, Cardano's passive marketing this time is like lifting a stone to hit its own foot. But if this continues, how can the technical team focus on building things... ADA has been hijacked by political topics like this, awkward. Reserve list? Sounds impressive but it's actually useless. I just want to know if this will complicate compliance. It feels like the officials need to come out and clarify things actively. The project's original intention has been skewed by public opinion, and that’s the most heartbreaking part.

View OriginalReply0

defi_detective

· 12h ago

Haha, laughing to death, the founder has been backstabbed by the officials --- The policy dividend is in hand, yet still entangled in technical narratives, this mindset is indeed extraordinary --- It's the same old story, politicians want traffic, project parties want recognition, but in the end, neither gets it --- The fact that ADA's price hasn't moved indicates that the market doesn't really believe this can be implemented --- Wait, are they saying that the project party was sold out and doesn’t even know? --- It looks like a political show from some congressman, using ADA as a prop --- The rift between technology and politics is a common topic, but this time it’s indeed a bit absurd --- It feels like the government is promoting it unilaterally, and no one really cares about ADA itself --- Being uninformed is actually more interesting, what does this detail imply?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-f759c414

· 12h ago

Hurry up and enter a position!🚗

View OriginalReply0

MerkleMaid

· 12h ago

This wave of suddenly adding ADA to the reserve list without any notice is indeed a bit outrageous. The market is stagnant, which makes it awkward; indeed, policy expectations do not equate to real money. Wait, the founders heard about it from the news? This communication is too far off. It's both technical and political; is ADA being hijacked? What happened to the promised decentralization? Now it's been taken over by the authorities, huh.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#2025GateYearEndSummary
35.09K Popularity
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWinGoldenBar
36.19K Popularity
#ETHTrendWatch
152.8K Popularity
#FedRateCutPrediction
82.95K Popularity
#ShowMyAlphaPoints
177.46K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
BOOKBOOK COIN
MC:$3.57KHolders:2
0.04%
2
tttTEK
MC:$3.52KHolders:1
0.00%
3
LUCKLUCKY
MC:$3.57KHolders:2
0.04%
4
100000BtcBd
MC:$3.53KHolders:1
0.00%
5
WTHwealth9231
MC:$3.58KHolders:2
0.04%

Sitemap