Whale preemptively positioned: 1.68 million coins accumulated before a governance vote of a certain mainstream token, with unrealized gains of 1.37 million USD in a week.

GasFeeLady · 2025-12-23T07:40:13+00:00

A certain large Wallet quietly accumulated more than 1.68 million UNI Tokens before the governance proposal vote, with a cost of 5.2 USD. After the proposal passed, it rose to 6.5 USD, resulting in unrealized gains of 1.37 million USD. This operation demonstrates a precise anticipation of market events.

GasFeeLady

2025-12-23 07:40:13

Abstract generation in progress

[Coin World] An interesting on-chain story. A large wallet quietly began accumulating before the governance proposal voting. From mid-December to the end of the month, over 1.68 million UNI tokens were proposed from a large trading platform, with a total value of 8.75 million dollars, and an average cost of only 5.2 dollars per token.

The timing is crucial - the governance proposal was officially submitted for voting on December 18, and it was finally approved on December 22. In just these few days, UNI rose to a high of $6.5. This address now has an unrealized profit of $1.37 million.

From an average price of $5.2 to a peak of $6.5, the increase exceeds 25%. What seems like a coincidental timing arrangement is actually a preemptive judgment of the impact of governance events. This is the operation at the whale level – accumulating chips before major events, waiting for the right moment.

UNI-4,2%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SybilAttackVictim

· 2025-12-26 04:24

Uh... this is obviously an inside job, right? Stockpiling before governance voting, and the timing is so perfectly controlled? It's the same old story, whales are always one step ahead of retail investors. We can only eat the leftovers. This move by UNI is truly brilliant. They started laying the groundwork when it was just over $5, waiting for the governance trend. Now, floating profits are at 137 million... People who can make this much money really live differently. Governance proposals should be decentralized, but it’s still dominated by big players, and I’m speechless. A 25% increase might not seem like much, but considering the scale, with $8.88 million in principal leveraged, those who understand will understand.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 2025-12-25 18:33

This whale information gap is incredible. 1.68 million UNI was pulled from 5.2 to 6.5, with a floating profit of 1.37 million in a week... I was just wondering why UNI was so active before the governance vote. It's still insider information, after all. Retail investors can only eat the dust. Damn, the timing is too precise. Submitted on the 18th and approved on the 22nd. The whale must have been lurking already. Accumulating coins on the eve of the governance vote—doesn't that clearly indicate they knew it would rise? By the way, is this compliant? The cost at 5.2 is hilarious. I was chasing higher when it was already over 6. This gap... Wait, is there tracking for this address? Next time, I should follow and copy the moves. Another "coincidence." How many "coincidences" in the crypto world are actually insider info.

View OriginalReply0

PuzzledScholar

· 2025-12-24 23:24

It's the same old trick again, whales know the script in advance, retail investors are just spectators, and the $1.37 million unrealized profit is how it was made? The information gap is really outrageous. While we're still looking at charts and candlesticks, they've already laid the groundwork before governance voting. How familiar you must be with this ecosystem to execute this UNI move so precisely... But then again, this insider vibe is indeed strong. This is the on-chain game, buddy. It's always institutions and retail investors playing two different sets.

View OriginalReply0

BoredApeResistance

· 2025-12-23 08:10

Whale is just a whale, stepping on the point so accurately, it turns out we are all here to run alongside.

View OriginalReply0

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 2025-12-23 08:02

It's this trap again; it has been 237 days since the last "coincidence." According to the database, this type of event has been suggested for inclusion in the Guinness Records, just waiting for the next wind to come.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-ccc36bc5

· 2025-12-23 07:58

A Whale is just a Whale, and we retail investors can't even get a sip of the soup.

View OriginalReply0

HappyToBeDumped

· 2025-12-23 07:54

It's the old trick of whales playing people for suckers again, 1.68 million UNI lying in ambush, this operation is a bit dirty. They started accumulating a week before the governance vote, this information gap can be played forever. From 5.2 to 6.5, is it really that simple? Why do I feel like there's such a strong insider smell? Retail investors can't react at all; they've already eaten their fill. Is this called "waiting for the wind to come?" It looks more like creating the wind themselves.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamBreaker

· 2025-12-23 07:47

This whale's moves are too ruthless, they can time it so precisely, it leaves me a bit breathless... --- It's the same old story, hoarding before governance, taking profits at will, and we retail investors are always in the position of dumb buyers, right? --- 1.68 million UNI earned 1.37 million in a week, what a huge information gap, mere mortals can't comprehend. --- Haha, good one, proposal on December 18, passed on the 22, such precise timing, coincidence? I don't believe you. --- Buying at 5.2 and selling at 6.5, a 25% rise is just basic operation for whales, while we are still discussing this, they've already exited. --- To be honest, I just want to know which institution or organization is behind this address, their information acquisition ability is incredible. --- The water in governance voting is a bit deep, it feels like there’s always someone mysteriously laying out plans before major proposals, am I overthinking?

View OriginalReply0