You ever notice how people with real intellectual depth across multiple fields tend to share one thing? Genuine curiosity. Take someone genuinely sharp in AI—they'd have that childlike wonder about what's actually happening under the hood. That's probably why in 2025, philosophers are racing to catch up with AI consciousness questions. The technical minds are building it, but the philosophical community is scrambling to understand what it means. It's a fascinating moment where domain expertise meets existential questions. What does intelligence actually look like when it's not bound by biology?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationOracle
· 16h ago
nah this is why real pros have a kind of childlike curiosity, while technical personnel are focused on creating AI, philosophers are instead in a panic.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 12-23 08:48
ngl The engineers have already run to the moon while the philosophers are still picking up stones on the ground.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 12-23 08:47
Doesn't this mean that truly intelligent people have a common trait, which is a strong curiosity... I think, many people working on AI right now don't care about that philosophical stuff at all, while philosophers are getting anxious and turning in circles.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiOrRekt
· 12-23 08:47
ngl this is real intellectual depth, curiosity is the all-purpose key
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 12-23 08:38
Well said, curiosity is indeed the passport of top players.
You ever notice how people with real intellectual depth across multiple fields tend to share one thing? Genuine curiosity. Take someone genuinely sharp in AI—they'd have that childlike wonder about what's actually happening under the hood. That's probably why in 2025, philosophers are racing to catch up with AI consciousness questions. The technical minds are building it, but the philosophical community is scrambling to understand what it means. It's a fascinating moment where domain expertise meets existential questions. What does intelligence actually look like when it's not bound by biology?