Injective's latest community buyback has just been completed, destroying 43,199.43 INJ this time. At this rate, by the first half of 2026, the total destroyed INJ is expected to exceed 7 million.
How does this mechanism work? Essentially, the protocol uses the fees generated each time to buy back INJ on the market, then permanently burn the purchased tokens. It sounds simple, but in reality, it continuously reduces the circulating supply of INJ.
Why is this meaningful for the ecosystem? From several perspectives:
First, the destroyed INJ comes entirely from on-chain real fees. This is not an arbitrary number, but a direct reflection of actual network usage. The more active user transactions are, the higher the fees, and the faster the burn rate.
Second, in the long term, this can gradually alleviate inflationary pressure. The supply is continuously decreasing, and the token's scarcity will gradually increase. For holders, this provides an invisible value appreciation guarantee.
Additionally, the entire process is community-driven, with high transparency. You can clearly see the specific numbers and timing of each burn.
As a Layer1 public chain focused on finance, Injective has recently experienced relatively cautious market sentiment, and the token price is also at a relatively low level. But interestingly, the burn mechanism has always been operating steadily, providing solid fundamental support for long-term holders.
Ultimately, Injective is using a continuously transparent buyback and burn mechanism to turn actual on-chain usage into deflationary momentum. It enhances token scarcity while laying the foundation for the ecosystem's long-term value. Despite short-term market caution, this community-driven deflationary model combined with solid financial infrastructure deployment demonstrates INJ's unique fundamental resilience in the Layer1 track.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
probably_nothing_anon
· 16h ago
Wait, over 430,000 INJ can be burned? Is this on-chain fee real or just made up?
By 2026, 7 million? How much actual trading volume is needed to support that?
Anyway, I don't believe this deflationary mechanism can save INJ's current price...
Actually, this setup sounds like a way to scam retail investors.
Can holders really profit from burns? I don't feel it.
Another public chain story about buybacks and burns—whoever believes it is naive.
Reducing supply ≠ price increase; it's such a simple principle that some can't even grasp it.
Community-driven? To put it bluntly, it just means no governance.
Fees come from real usage... then why is the trading volume so low?
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdropper
· 16h ago
7 million tokens burned sounds impressive, but the key still depends on whether on-chain activity can support it.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedElder
· 17h ago
The destruction speed is fast, but why can't the price go up?
---
7 million tokens sounds like a lot, but the market just doesn't buy it, I don't understand
---
Real cost-driven destruction, there's really no doubt about that, let's see if it can support the price later
---
How to say, the mechanism is fine, the problem is that the market has no main narrative, right?
---
Every time I hear about destruction stories, but still no one wants it, it's a bit speechless
---
High transparency is great, but why does it feel like no one is paying attention to INJ?
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 17h ago
Hmm... this destruction speed is actually reliable; real money comes from fees.
7 million tokens by 2026? At first glance, the number is intimidating, but it depends on how active the users are.
It seems that INJ's mechanism is essentially betting on its own usage; if they dare to burn, it shows confidence in the ecosystem.
The best time for the mechanism to work is actually when the price is low.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFan
· 17h ago
Another round of burning, this number is indeed accumulating
The idea behind INJ is actually quite practical, truly using fees to buy back rather than just producing air
Long-term holding still has some meaning, just worried about continued short-term decline
The stable operational mechanism is worth肯定, unlike some projects that talk big but deliver little
Seeing the 2026 forecast of 7 million, it feels a bit optimistic... Can the market really stay this active?
---
When prices are so low, they are actually burning coins, which is betting on future growth
---
The biggest risk of buyback and burn is that once the hype fades, on-chain usage drops sharply, and the burn rate also slows down...
---
I trust the community-driven transparency, but can real fees support deflation? Still need to watch more
---
By the way, does INJ have any recent application ecosystem activity? Just burning coins without activity is pointless
View OriginalReply0
OPsychology
· 17h ago
It's actually pretty satisfying to see these numbers when holding at a low position, just consider it as saving up.
Injective's latest community buyback has just been completed, destroying 43,199.43 INJ this time. At this rate, by the first half of 2026, the total destroyed INJ is expected to exceed 7 million.
How does this mechanism work? Essentially, the protocol uses the fees generated each time to buy back INJ on the market, then permanently burn the purchased tokens. It sounds simple, but in reality, it continuously reduces the circulating supply of INJ.
Why is this meaningful for the ecosystem? From several perspectives:
First, the destroyed INJ comes entirely from on-chain real fees. This is not an arbitrary number, but a direct reflection of actual network usage. The more active user transactions are, the higher the fees, and the faster the burn rate.
Second, in the long term, this can gradually alleviate inflationary pressure. The supply is continuously decreasing, and the token's scarcity will gradually increase. For holders, this provides an invisible value appreciation guarantee.
Additionally, the entire process is community-driven, with high transparency. You can clearly see the specific numbers and timing of each burn.
As a Layer1 public chain focused on finance, Injective has recently experienced relatively cautious market sentiment, and the token price is also at a relatively low level. But interestingly, the burn mechanism has always been operating steadily, providing solid fundamental support for long-term holders.
Ultimately, Injective is using a continuously transparent buyback and burn mechanism to turn actual on-chain usage into deflationary momentum. It enhances token scarcity while laying the foundation for the ecosystem's long-term value. Despite short-term market caution, this community-driven deflationary model combined with solid financial infrastructure deployment demonstrates INJ's unique fundamental resilience in the Layer1 track.