Market observers have raised a critical concern: ambitious infrastructure initiatives might never reach completion if political priorities shift. A change in administration could potentially derail ongoing programs before they materialize. This policy volatility introduces real uncertainty for projects dependent on government support or regulatory stability. The takeaway? Investors need to factor in political cycle risks when assessing long-term crypto and infrastructure plays.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MysteriousZhangvip
· 8h ago
NGL political risk can really cause a market crash; we've seen this happen in the crypto space before.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDayvip
· 8h ago
That's why I don't touch policy-driven projects... too dependent on people's reactions.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodlervip
· 8h ago
Policy risk, I've understood it long ago. Change the government and it's over. That's why I don't get involved in projects that rely on government support.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBrovip
· 8h ago
NGL policy trends are really hard to predict, the previous construction plans keep changing... That's why I have always been a bit pessimistic about long-term infrastructure projects.
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomniavip
· 9h ago
NGL, political risk is really easy to overlook... It sounds like talking about US infrastructure, but crypto isn't any different. A change in leadership often leads to market reversals, which is common.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)