Think about it: if computing power keeps pushing technology forward without needing humans to step in, and we keep funneling the profits back into building even faster machines—what happens next? Wealth could explode at speeds we've never seen before. It's not just incremental growth anymore. It's compounding on steroids.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BloodInStreets
· 13h ago
Hey, isn't this just the dream of perpetual motion for capital? Reinvest profits → machines get faster → more profits → keep feeding the machines. In the end, who makes money? It's none other than those holding the source code. We're just waiting to be harvested like chives.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaBrain
· 13h ago
It's the same old story... AI automation to make money and then buy more computing power? Sounds very appealing, but I can't shake the feeling that something's off.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiac
· 13h ago
It sounds like a vicious cycle... The faster the machine, the more profit it makes, and the profits are reinvested to build even faster machines. But the key issue has been overlooked—who designs this incentive mechanism? Who regulates it? Throughout history, whenever such positive feedback occurs, there has never been a case that didn't end in a crash.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAll
· 13h ago
Hmm... This sounds like a perpetual motion machine dream, but can it really print money automatically like this?
Think about it: if computing power keeps pushing technology forward without needing humans to step in, and we keep funneling the profits back into building even faster machines—what happens next? Wealth could explode at speeds we've never seen before. It's not just incremental growth anymore. It's compounding on steroids.