The quantum computing threat to Bitcoin has been a recurring concern, but the timeline deserves closer scrutiny. Back in 2011, tech enthusiasts were already claiming that practical quantum computing was just five years away—a prediction that clearly didn't materialize on that schedule.
What's interesting is how the quantum landscape itself has evolved. Post-quantum cryptographic signatures have become increasingly compact over time, making them more feasible for blockchain implementation. This evolution actually supports Bitcoin's cautious approach. Rather than rushing to implement quantum-resistant solutions prematurely, the network has benefited from waiting as post-quantum cryptography matured and became more practical.
The takeaway? Bitcoin's deliberate pace in addressing quantum risks has aligned well with the actual technological progress in the field. By the time quantum threats become genuinely urgent, the cryptographic tools available will likely be far more optimized than if the network had moved too quickly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xDreamChaser
· 7h ago
Those people in 2011 really knew how to draw big pies, promising five years of quantum computing power? Laughing to death, it's been more than ten five-year periods now...
View OriginalReply0
GasGasGasBro
· 7h ago
Quantum stuff, we've been talking about it for over ten years and it still hasn't arrived. I think it's just the old FOMO routine... Let's wait until it really happens before discussing it.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCry
· 7h ago
The narrative that quantum threats have been hyped for over ten years... and the result? Still nothing, haha
The quantum computing threat to Bitcoin has been a recurring concern, but the timeline deserves closer scrutiny. Back in 2011, tech enthusiasts were already claiming that practical quantum computing was just five years away—a prediction that clearly didn't materialize on that schedule.
What's interesting is how the quantum landscape itself has evolved. Post-quantum cryptographic signatures have become increasingly compact over time, making them more feasible for blockchain implementation. This evolution actually supports Bitcoin's cautious approach. Rather than rushing to implement quantum-resistant solutions prematurely, the network has benefited from waiting as post-quantum cryptography matured and became more practical.
The takeaway? Bitcoin's deliberate pace in addressing quantum risks has aligned well with the actual technological progress in the field. By the time quantum threats become genuinely urgent, the cryptographic tools available will likely be far more optimized than if the network had moved too quickly.