The dev behind this project is pure builder—totally focused on development. Here's the token allocation breakdown: 3% of supply is locked, 2% was transferred separately. The key point? The dev doesn't actually hold the token supply. Revenue comes purely from creator fees on the platform, not from token holdings. This matters because it eliminates the classic risk of massive dumps from early stakeholders. With supply actually released into the market rather than concentrated, price movement is governed by genuine supply-demand mechanics. No hidden bags waiting to tank the price—just straightforward market forces at play.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Rugman_Walking
· 10h ago
Developers not taking tokens? That's true trust, no fear of dumping the market.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumper
· 11h ago
Dev doesn't take coins? Just listen and forget it, this set of excuses sounds too familiar.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 11h ago
Hey, finally seeing a project where the devs are not hoarding tokens, now that's more like it.
The dev behind this project is pure builder—totally focused on development. Here's the token allocation breakdown: 3% of supply is locked, 2% was transferred separately. The key point? The dev doesn't actually hold the token supply. Revenue comes purely from creator fees on the platform, not from token holdings. This matters because it eliminates the classic risk of massive dumps from early stakeholders. With supply actually released into the market rather than concentrated, price movement is governed by genuine supply-demand mechanics. No hidden bags waiting to tank the price—just straightforward market forces at play.