Central banks are printing money like crazy, but no one can print new Bitcoin. This may sound like a joke, but behind it lies a harsh reality.

The global monetary system is undergoing an unprecedented test. Central banks around the world are releasing liquidity in waves to cope with economic pressures. However, the purchasing power behind each piece of paper currency is quietly shrinking. In contrast, the total supply of Bitcoin is permanently capped at 21 million coins — a rule hardcoded into the code that no one, no institution can change.

What does this difference really mean? It means that as fiat currencies continue to depreciate, Bitcoin’s relative scarcity will only become more pronounced.

Traditional assets rely on banking systems, policy support, and institutional credit. Bitcoin is different; its value is maintained by global market consensus, not dependent on any single authority. No central bank can freeze it, and no government can arbitrarily increase its supply. This characteristic makes it naturally a choice for wealth preservation.

Looking at the data over the past few years makes it clear — whenever economic uncertainty rises and inflation expectations heat up, institutional investors and savvy individual investors quietly increase their Bitcoin holdings. Not because they are gambling, but because they are hedging risks.

When the credibility of the traditional financial system is wavering and the purchasing power of paper money is declining, owning an asset that is absolutely scarce and cannot be overissued has shifted from an "option" to a "necessity." The era of Bitcoin is essentially arriving this way.