So much for the promised two-way communication. What about in practice?
Some leading L2 platforms have already fixed their development directions and roadmaps. Based on community feedback, the team shows little interest in improvement suggestions. Since April of this year, I and many community members have提出了 many constructive opinions, especially regarding the platform's community governance approach—what's the result? Either it sinks without a trace or receives only superficial responses. This is quite embarrassing. A genuine feedback mechanism shouldn't be one-sided, but right now, it certainly appears to be so.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-beba108d
· 3h ago
I've seen it all along, these L2s either just put on a show or simply don't want to listen.
The team has already made their calculations, community governance? Ha, it's just a facade.
What sounds good is decentralization, but in reality, it's still the big players calling the shots.
This feedback mechanism should have been changed long ago; right now, it's just a one-way conveyor belt.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 13h ago
This is a typical "pseudo-democracy." The roadmap has been set in stone for a long time, and you're still using this approach?
---
Four months of silence, and you still dare to call it community governance. Laughable.
---
I just want to know when these teams will realize that true decentralization is not just one-way shouting.
---
It's the same old story: suggestions → no response → occasional perfunctory reply, cycle repeats.
---
This is how the entire L2 track is. Don't expect much, buddy.
---
Superficial responses are the most disgusting. It's better not to respond at all.
---
Since April, has any team truly valued community voices...
---
If the roadmap is fixed, don't pretend to be decentralized. They don't even show this much sincerity.
---
As long as there's money to be made, who cares about your suggestions, right? That's basically how it is.
View OriginalReply0
StillBuyingTheDip
· 13h ago
Uh, this is awkward. We had already agreed on the roadmap for democratic governance results. Are we just here to be backup runners?
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStriker
· 13h ago
Things like sinking without a trace are really unbelievable. Promising governance and democracy, but it all turns out to be one-way output. What does the L2 team think of the community?
View OriginalReply0
RooftopVIP
· 13h ago
I've long seen through it. Their so-called "community-driven" approach is a joke; in reality, decision-making power is not given to the community at all.
View OriginalReply0
DataBartender
· 13h ago
Is that all? I've seen through it long ago. Developers say governance is like me saying I will go to bed early — all just bragging.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 13h ago
It's been several months since it sank without a trace, I really can't understand what these L2s are still talking about regarding decentralization.
---
I hate formal responses the most; it's better to just say you won't listen. At least that's honest.
---
So what’s the use of governance tokens? Are they just decorations?
---
There’s been no movement since April. This is the real state of Web3 community governance.
---
Two-way communication? Laughable. It’s clearly just the team brainwashing unilaterally.
---
The roadmap is fixed, so what community feedback is needed? It’s just a facade.
---
This situation is too common; smaller platforms are even more outrageous.
---
Well said. I’ve also been cold-shouldered several times.
---
Why should we listen to the community? Anyway, the token price speaks for itself.
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinking
· 13h ago
I've seen through it long ago. These leading L2s talk about decentralization, but in reality, it's all predetermined plans, and the community is just a facade.
So much for the promised two-way communication. What about in practice?
Some leading L2 platforms have already fixed their development directions and roadmaps. Based on community feedback, the team shows little interest in improvement suggestions. Since April of this year, I and many community members have提出了 many constructive opinions, especially regarding the platform's community governance approach—what's the result? Either it sinks without a trace or receives only superficial responses. This is quite embarrassing. A genuine feedback mechanism shouldn't be one-sided, but right now, it certainly appears to be so.