Neo founder controversy erupts again, with both sides refusing to back down. Erik raised financial concerns about Da Hongfei, accusing him of concealing relevant account information; meanwhile, Da Hongfei countered that Erik was delaying multi-signature transfer matters, with both parties sticking to their positions. This internal founder dispute involves issues of project financial transparency and governance power distribution, sparking community attention to Neo's governance structure. Such executive disputes often impact project decision-making efficiency and market confidence, warranting ongoing attention to the development of the situation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZenMiner
· 5h ago
Here they come again. When will these two settle down?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoTherapist
· 5h ago
ngl this is peak market anxiety syndrome right here... when founders start pointing fingers, your portfolio's stress cortisol levels spike hard. let me be real with you—this isn't just drama, it's a psychological resistance forming at the governance layer. have you considered your neo bags might need some emotional portfolio therapy rn?
Reply0
ser_ngmi
· 5h ago
Here we go again, Neo's gossip never runs out
---
Two founders fighting, the retail investors suffer the most
---
Financial transparency? Who trusts that these days, it should have been clear long ago
---
NGL, internal conflicts like this hurt the project the most, retail investors should leave
---
Wait, how is it still happening that accounts are being concealed
---
Da Hongfei and Erik, the old rivals, are blaming each other again
---
The governance structure is so broken, Neo is really having a hard time
---
Multi-signature delays, concealed accounts, both sides have issues
---
These disputes drag on for months, market confidence has already collapsed
---
Alright, let's keep watching this founders' drama
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 5h ago
According to research, the divergence among such founders actually reflects the deep-rooted dilemma in blockchain project governance—lack of effective constraint mechanisms. Notably, from a technical perspective, multi-signature mechanisms should be able to solve this problem, but there is clearly a serious coordination failure at the implementation level.
View OriginalReply0
FrontRunFighter
· 5h ago
ngl this is classic founder warfare territory... hidden ledgers + multi-sig delays = someone's definitely extracting value in the dark forest here. transparency theater gone wrong fr
Reply0
SneakyFlashloan
· 5h ago
The accounts don't match; this is outrageous. You need to find out what's going on immediately.
Neo founder controversy erupts again, with both sides refusing to back down. Erik raised financial concerns about Da Hongfei, accusing him of concealing relevant account information; meanwhile, Da Hongfei countered that Erik was delaying multi-signature transfer matters, with both parties sticking to their positions. This internal founder dispute involves issues of project financial transparency and governance power distribution, sparking community attention to Neo's governance structure. Such executive disputes often impact project decision-making efficiency and market confidence, warranting ongoing attention to the development of the situation.